Wages of Virtue: The Relative Pay of Care Work
By P. England, Michelle J. Budig, N. Folbre. 2002
625 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b755603da3bd5295ce8fd14c554e9641e24da56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- A. Eagly
- Shelley J. Correll
- S. Strauss
- Kathrin Leuze
- S. Benard
- P. England
- R. Glauber
- Michelle J. Budig
In Gender Studies
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- The Payoff to Skill in the Third Industrial Revolution1 (2013, background): “…that estimate the net effects of closure in the context of multiple controls for skill ðe.g., Weeden 2002Þ, while research on the wage penalty for nurturing likewise typically conditions on a multidimensional measurement of skill ðe.g., Kilbourne et al. 1994; England, Budig, and Folbre 2002Þ.”
- Why do occupations dominated by women pay less? How ‘female-typical’ work tasks and working-time arrangements affect the gender wage gap among higher education graduates (2016, background): “So far, many empirical studies support the ‘devaluation thesis’ (e.g. England, 1992; England et al., 2000, 2002; Perales, 2013).2 However, in the literature the issue remains unresolved whether ‘female-typical’ occupations are valued less simply due to their higher share of women or because of…”
- Gender Inequality in Labor Markets: The Role of Motherhood and Segregation (2005, background): “Care work pays less than other work requiring the same amount of skill, effort and risk (England and Folbre 1999; England et al. 2002).”
- Rethinking job satisfaction in care work: looking beyond the care debates (2015, background): “However, while the intrinsic rewards of the job may compensate in part for low wages the theory fails to explain why a preference for care work leads to a pay penalty and why there are labour shortages in the sector if jobs are so rewarding (England et al., 2002).”
- Biased estimators? Comparing status and statistical theories of gender discrimination (2006, background): “Foschi (2002) has proposed the ‘‘application files’’ experimental setting, where evaluators evaluate hypothetical job applicants who differ on a nominal distinction that carries status value, like gender, for a summer intern position in engineering.”
- Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy (2006, background): “Such occupations tend to pay less than other jobs with otherwise similar characteristics (Budig et al., 2002).”
- The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. (2009, background): “Impediments to men taking on such roles include the lower wages of occupations that emphasize caring (England, 2006; England et al., 2002), men’s lack of self-efficacy in relation to such activity (Giles & Rea, 1999), social expectations that men are deficient in communal skills (Cejka & Eagly, 1999”