Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding

By B. Holmes, D. Steinke, R. Ward. 2009

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b2c11f9757a1ce0875b3643bd0af56305cbee00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. K. Jensen
2. Gavin J. P. Naylor
3. P. Last
4. W. White
5. J. Caira
6. K. M. Rosana

In Molecular Biology

1. K. Jensen
2. Philippe Archambault
3. Gavin J. P. Naylor
4. P. Last
5. W. White
6. Nicolas Straube
7. Massimo Labra
8. M. Barbuto

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. K. Jensen
2. Philippe Archambault
3. Gavin J. P. Naylor
4. P. Last
5. W. White
6. J. Caira
7. K. M. Rosana
8. A. Radulovici

Citations in the corpus

• A review of current PCR-based methodologies for the authentication of meats from game animal species. (2010, background): “Holmes, Steinke, and Ward (2009) identified correctly shark and ray species by DNA barcode analysis.”
• A DNA Sequence–Based Approach To the Identification of Shark and Ray Species and Its Implications for Global Elasmobranch Diversity and Parasitology (2012, background): “There has been much recent interest in exploring elasmobranch sequence variation using the barcode marker cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) (e.g., Holmes et al., 2009; Moura et al., 2008; Toffoli et al., 2008; Ward et al., 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009; Ward and Holmes, 2007; Wong et al., 2009; Zemlak et al.,…”
• DNA Barcodes for Marine Biodiversity: Moving Fast Forward? (2010, background): “The extent of this phenomenon on the global market of fresh, smoked or dried fish products varies across continents [20,49-51] and the possible explanations include genuine mislabeling due to morphological similarities between closely related species or fraudulent”
• DNA Barcoding, species delineation and taxonomy: a historical perspective (2015, unknown): “Second, DNA barcodes are effective whatever the life stages under scrutiny [14,15] or available biological materials for identification [16,17].”
• Elasmobranch Phylogeny: A Mitochondrial Estimate Based on 595 Species (2012, background): “As CO1 barcode sequences pour into GenBank for a diversity of elasmobranchs (e.g., Holmes et al., 2009; Mariguela et al., 2009; Quattro et al., 2006; Richards et al., 2009; Serra-Pereira et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2008; Spies et al., 2006; Straube et al., 2010, 2011; Toffoli et al., 2008; Ward and…”
• DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp.) (2010, background): “Coherently to previous published studies (Holmes et al., 2009; Ward et al., 2005, 2008), DNA barcoding is clearly a useful tool for the species identification.”