Development of executive function during childhood
By Y. Moriguchi, N. Chevalier, Philip David Zelazo. 2016
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4aff16633b8367dc150d5af07620cf0214ca5884
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Social Buffering of the HPA Axis: A Review of Animal Models and Human Studies across Development (2013, background): “These higher order processes are crucial for the development of emotion regulation, compliance with norms, and intelligent planning of behavior from childhood to adult age (Zelazo et al., 2008).”
- Executive Function and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analytic Review (2018, methodology): “Researchers have also linked the anterior cingulate cortex with monitoring of performance, thus allowing for the detection of errors and further processing as needed to facilitate the attainment of goals (Ridderinkhof, Ullsperger, Crone, & Nieuwenhuis, 2004; Zelazo et al., 2008).”
- Specifying Links Between Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind during Middle Childhood: Cognitive Flexibility Predicts Social Understanding (2015, background): “…executive functioning is related to theory of mind during their emergence in early childhood (Carlson, Mandell, & Williams, 2004; Carlson & Moses, 2001; Frye et al., 1995; Hughes & Ensor, 2007; Hughes & Graham, 2002; Oh & Lewis, 2008; Sabbagh, Xu, Carlson, Moses, & Lee, 2006; Zelazo & Frye, 1998).”
- Executive functioning predicts academic achievement in middle school: A four-year longitudinal study (2016, methodology): “, Anderson, Anderson, Jacobs, & SpencerSmith, 2008). However, a number of authors have argued that performance-based measures have limited ecological-related validity—that is, there is little relationship between a neuropsychological test and the participant’s behavior in real-world settings (Isquit”