Student Online Plagiarism: How Do We Respond?

By Patrick M. Scanlon. 2003

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health Informatics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a8f5dcc4b1648aa019abdc6f42d4bd1a9379ea8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health Informatics

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Online Exams and Cheating: An Empirical Analysis of Business Students' Views (2009, background): “First, academicians have suggested that it is critical to clearly spell out the academic standards regarding what constitutes cheating by the college or university at large and by individual faculty at the commencement of each course (Scanlon, 2004).”
Academic Dishonesty: Are Business Students Different From Other College Students? (2006, background): “Finally, researchers offer the following additional reasons for why students cheat: (a) genuine lack of understanding of what is plagiarism (Park, 2003), (b) efficiency gain (Park; Payne & Nantz, 1994), (c) time management problems 102 Journal of Education for Business (Lambert et al., 2003; Park, P”
Proctored versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance. (2009, background): “The most commonly reported challenge in online assessment is how to maintain academic integrity (which is a challenge in traditional courses as well); specifically, how do we catch cheating, verify the identity of the student, and curtail plagiarism (Byrd & Lott, 2003; Scanlon, 2003).”
Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do (2010, background): “This new threat to academic integrity has spawned a fresh generation of literature on issues such as: the prevention and detection of Internet plagiarism (Scanlon 2003; McLafferty and Foust 2004; Sterngold 2004; Compton and Pfau 2008; Ma, Wan, and Lu 2008), the ethical and philosophical issues surro”
Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective (2010, background): “The Internet’s widespread availability and use in academic settings, its potential as a documentary source and its potential to facilitate the copying, pasting and editing of great quantities of written content—using word processors—have brought about a spectacular yet worrisome rise in cases of stu”