Academic Dishonesty: Are Business Students Different From Other College Students?
By R. Iyer, J. Eastman. 2006
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/520718f1a6004fd33c5957ff3415d5fcef88f655
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
In Safety Research
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The Fox in the Hen House: A Critical Examination of Plagiarism Among Members of the Academy of Management (2012, background): “…with plagiarism are aggressive (Type A) personality (Buckley, Wiese, & Harvey, 1998); external locus of control (Crown & Spiller, 1998); low self-efficacy (Murdock, Hale, & Weber, 2001); low self-esteem (Lyer & Eastman, 2006); and lower levels of school identification (Finn & Frone, 2004).”
- Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism (2014, background): “…why students’ plagiarise (Burrus, McGoldrick, and Schuhmann 2007; McCabe 2005a; Sutherland-Smith 2005), who plagiarises (Harding et al 2007; Iyer and Eastman 2006; McCabe 2005b), how they plagiarise (McCabe and Trevino 1993), how many plagiarise (Hard, Conway, and Moran 2006; Lin and Wen…”
- An Investigation of College Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty, Reasons for Dishonesty, Achievement Goals, and Willingness to Report Dishonest Behavior (2013, background): “Similarly, research on the impact of a student’s academic major on AD has produced inconsistent findings (Eastman, Eastman, & Iyer, 2008; Iyer & Eastman, 2006; Park, 2003; Smyth & Davis, 2004).”