Social learning analytics: five approaches

By Rebecca Ferguson, Simon Buckingham Shum. International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 2012

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research (2017, unknown): “[37] I T S L, I A 9 219 [38] T, I T, S L 1 [10] T, I T, S U L, I, LA, DB 4 [39] T, I T, S 3 [28] T, I T, S L, I, LA 3 A 1,169 [40] I T, S U L, E 2 A 22 [41] I T U L, E 3 C 6 [42] I T, S, R S L, LA 1 [43] I T U L, LA 2 [32] I S U L 1 A 28 [44] I T U L 2 C 4 [45] I T L 1 [46] I T U L 1 [47] T, I S U L”
Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis (2019, unknown): “Networked learning benefits from the utilization of technology to establish connections between students, instructors, commu- nities, and resources (Ferguson and Shum, 2012).”
The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules (2016, background): “In terms of social LA conceptualisations, the next five categories describe different options available to teachers to create an interactive, social learning environment (Buckingham Shum & Ferguson, 2012; Ferguson & Buckingham Shum, 2012; Hickey et al., 2014).”