Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway

By Richard Ling, Birgitte Yttri. 2002

778 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a7e3fbdb0755da5273bd69322869718c1412d46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

What's up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS (2013, background): “The research to date has spanned various countries including Finland[8], Norway[10], Japan[7], the UK [5, 4, 3, 14] and the US[1].”
The Effects of Cell Phone Usage Rules on Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships (2012, background): “Accessibility is a sign of status and belonging (Boneva, Quinn, Kraut, Kiesler, & Shklovski, 2006; Ling & Yttri, 2002 ).”
Text or Talk? Social Anxiety, Loneliness, and Divergent Preferences for Cell Phone Use (2007, neutral): “26 Furthermore, individual differences in base rates of social contact are likely to be reflected in our judgment measures: although they estimate making fewer voice calls per month, socially anx-ious participants did not simply report sending more texts, as might be expected from our analysis of…”
Absence Makes the Communication Grow Fonder: Geographic Separation, Interpersonal Media, and Intimacy in Dating Relationships (2013, background): “Asynchronous text-based communication involves substantial strategic disclosure of personal information (Gibbs, Ellison, & Heino, 2006), while mobile communication reveals frequent but nuanced disclosures of daily routines and affection (Ling & Yttri, 2002; Thurlow, 2003).”
THE SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SMS TEXT MESSAGING (2004, background): “However, despite a small number of qualitative studies of teenagers’ use of text messaging (e.g. Thurlow, 2003; Kasesniemi & Rautiainen, 2002; Ling & Yttri, 2002; Puro, 2002), little is known about the psychological impact of texting on social interaction amongst regular users, nor on the long-term…”
Mobile Communication as a Social Stage (2004, background): “…the mobile communication of young people has been studied systematically in many countries, including Norway (Ling, 2002; Ling and Helmersen, 2000; Ling and Yttri, 2002; Skog, 2002), the UK (Green, 2002; Haddon, 2002), Italy (Fortunati and Magnanelli, 2002), Germany (Höflich and Rössler, 2002),…”
Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness (2011, background): “Perhaps other structural/contextual variables (such as temporal ability to synchronize schedules for offline contact; Ling & Yttri, 2002) influence frequency of offline communication with specific Facebook Friends, and thus the hypothesized associations did not emerge.”
Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: Mobile Phone Use, Relational Uncertainty, Love, Commitment, and Attachment Styles (2010, background): “Similarly, Ling and Yttri (2002) found that young people used mobile phones to coordinate each other’s activities.”
CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION (2007, background): “The work of Choi in the US (2004), Abdullah in Malaysia (2004), Roessler and Hoeflich in Germany (2002), and our own work in Norway (Ling & Yttri, 2002; Ling et al., 2003) supports the idea that this is an important function particularly in the context of the innermost circle of friends and family.”
Sexting, Mobile Porn Use, and Peer Group Dynamics: Boys' and Girls' Self-Perceived Popularity, Need for Popularity, and Perceived Peer Pressure (2014, background): “…practices: Teens report that they experience peer pressure to engage in sexting and mobile porn use and suggest that both behaviors are used to achieve peer acceptance and to display or gain status (Bond, 2010; Lenhart, 2009; Ling & Yttri, 2002; Lippman & Campbell, 2012; Ringrose et al., 2012).”
Harm and Offence in Media Content: A Review of the Evidence (2006, background): “Some studies suggest that constant access to mobile telephones is breaking down social structures and norms (Berelowitz, 2004; Ling and Yttri, 2002), and may be interfering with interfamilial processes.”
Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life (2006, background): “The socalled microcoordination is a typical daily-life example, in which two people with mobile phones flexibly and progressively make precise arrangements for a meeting ( Ling & Yttri, 2002 ).”
Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on (2006, background): “Like Ling and Yttri [39], they point to the ways in which mobile messaging technologies support “hypercoordination,” providing a “last 100 yards” solution for rendezvous, as well as allowing very fine-grained coordination of actions in space when people are together.”
Mobile Social Networks and Social Practice: A Case Study of Dodgeball (2007, methodology): “As Nick points out, sometimes sending a check-in message is meant to start a conversation about meeting up: In this way, Dodgeball use is similar to trends of micro-coordination (Ling & Yttri, 2002).”
Mobile Phones in Romantic Relationships and the Dialectic of Autonomy Versus Connection (2011, background): “What remains to be addressed is to what extent those interactions represent micro-coordination versus hyper-coordination (Ling & Yttri, 2002).”