International comparative analysis of the association between board structure and the efficiency of value added by a firm from its physical capital and intellectual capital resources

By C. Ho, S. Williams. 2003

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a79f5a4450ba1a9b8cb8c63506e2dcd84a867e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia (2016, background): “However, in contrast, others argue that a larger board, in order to increases the opportunity for manipulation, can be less participating between members (Ho and Williams, 2003).”
Ownership Structure and Intellectual Capital Performance in Malaysia (2009, unknown): “…MIi +Ti (2) where P = retained profit for the year I = interest expense C = salaries and wages D = depreciation A = amortisation DIV = dividend MI = minority's share of profit T = tax All measures are for company i. 10 More on VA calculations can be found in Pulic (1998) and Ho and Williams (2003).”
Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure in prospectuses of initial public offerings (2008, result): “Prior research (Cooke, 1989; Marston and Shrives, 1991; Ho and Williams, 2003) reports either approach typically yields similar results.”
Determinants of financial performance of Islamic banks: An intellectual capital perspective (2017, methodology): “The value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC TM ) devised by Pulic (2000) forms the basis in measuring the efficiency of value added (VA) by a firm’s total resources as well as each major resource component (Ho and Williams, 2003).”
Disclosure, Corporate Governance and Foreign Share Ownership on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (2007, unknown): “(see for example, Ho and Williams, 2003; Mangena and Pike, 2005), but consistent with those reported in Sweden (see Ho and Williams, 2003).”
Board Structure and Corporate Performance in Malaysia (2009, background): “Ho and Williams (2003) used about 84 to 108 companies for each of the countries included in their study, and Judge et al.”
The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance: A Modified and Extended VAIC Model (2020, methodology): “Among them, the VAIC model proposed by Pulic (1998) is broadly used both in academia and practice (Ho & Williams, 2003; Mohapatra et al., 2019; Xu & Liu, 2019).”
Voluntary Corporate Governance Disclosures by Post-Apartheid South African Corporations (2012, unknown): “Ho and Williams (2003) report no link between board size and performance in a sample of 84 SA corporations, while Mangena and Chamisa (2008) indicate that board size has no impact on incidences of listing suspensions using a sample of 81 SA firms.”
Board diversity and organizational valuation: unravelling the effects of ethnicity and gender (2013, background): “…ethnically diverse countries in the world (Armstrong et al., 2006; West, 2009; Ntim and Soobaroyen, 2013a, b), long-standing apartheid policy of racial, social, economic and political segregation resulted in largely homogenous organizational boards (Ho and Williams, 2003; Swartz and Firer, 2005).”
Investigating the value and efficiency of intellectual capital (2007, background): “association between corporate board structure and corporate performance ( Ho and Williams, 2003”
Corporate Boards, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in an Environment of Severe Political and Economic Crisis (2012, unknown): “We eliminated 54 reports published by banks and insurance firms in line with previous studies (e.g., Weir et al., 2002; Ho and Williams, 2003).”