BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey

By Lennart E. Nacke, C. Bateman, Regan L. Mandryk. Entertainment Computing, 2014

336 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a3c0889c542b6f29458a9ca698bd5667fb0da25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Julita Vassileva
2. Rita Orji
3. Regan L. Mandryk
4. Lennart E. Nacke
5. Juho Hamari
6. Jonna Koivisto

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Julita Vassileva
2. Rita Orji
3. Regan L. Mandryk
4. Juho Hamari

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Juho Hamari
2. Lennart E. Nacke
3. Rita Orji
4. Julita Vassileva
5. Seiji Isotani
6. Wilk Oliveira
7. Luiz Rodrigues
8. Lei Shi

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health (2014, methodology): “Although a relatively new model, BrainHex is based less on intuition, and more on neurobiological foundations; in addition, it has been validated with large numbers of participants (Nacke et al. 2011).”
• Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda (2022, background): “In general, the community is based on theoretical studies about different perceptions of people on gamification design (e.g. Bartle 1996; Nacke et al., 2014; Yee 2006).”
• The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale (2016, methodology): “The BrainHex model [31,32] was developed considering previous player typologies and neurobiological research.”