Motivational science : social and personality perspectives

By E. Tory Higgins, Arie W. Kruglanski. 2000

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/498e4d53350ab7660582bf6b6e2404bdcba59495

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Parent Motivation to Participate in Treatment: Assessment and Prediction of Subsequent Participation (2006, methodology): “We developed the Parent Motivation Inventory (PMI) drawing from prior research on motivation in general (e.g., Eccles, Wigfield, & Schiefele, 1998; Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000; Prochaska, DiClemente, & Norcross, 1992; Sifneos, 1978; Zweben & Zuckoff, 2002) and work on motivation for psychosocial…”
APPLYING SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY TO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH (2003, background): “…relevant dependent variables such as job performance and training outcomes suggest the continued dominance of these theories (Locke, 2000; Mathieu & Martineau, 1997), despite the much broader array of motivation theories available within the psychological literature (Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000).”
A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. (2003, background): “…decision rules for establishing the number, measurement issues, procedures and criteria for distinguishing basic or primary from secondary instincts, drives, or needs, and cross-cultural generalizability (Heine, Lehman, Markus, & Kitayama, 1999; Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000; Pintrich & Schunk, 2002).”
Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention (2006, background): “Last, but not least, it will be important to consider the extent to which the eVects of behavioral enactment may be accounted for by Regulatory Focus Theory (RFT; Higgins, 2000), a framework that has been widely used to elucidate the link between motivation and cognition.”
Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. (2005, background): “For example, motivation, including unconscious motivation, is back at center stage (e.g., Bargh, 1996; Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000); and, somewhat ironically, the study of cognitive processes has yielded powerful and clever research techniques that can also be used to study dynamic, unconscious…”
A self-regulatory framework for message framing☆ (2013, background): “…arewell established; drawing on a theory of self-regulationmeans utilizing a framework whose basic postulates are already supported (see, e.g., Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000). predicted loss-frame advantage for Breast Self-Exam, theywrote: “For example, women who worry about the risk of finding…”
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making (2008, background): “The tendency to focus on either cognitive or motivational processes underlying group work and group decision making is unfortunate because “without a thorough understanding of motivation, the cognitive approach cannot explain the intricacies of human psychology” (Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000, p. 1).”
The goal construct in social psychology. (2007, background): “Aspects of this definition have been echoed in goal literature throughout the past 50 years (e.g., see Carver & Scheier, 1981; Gollwitzer & Moskowitz, 1996; Higgins & Kruglanski, 2000; Locke & Latham, 1990; Sorrentino & Higgins, 1986).”