Assessing the quality of qualitative research.

By P. Salmon. Patient Education and Counseling, 2013

822 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4952215e540dfb574a7b9a5113640182d78d21e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. (2016, background): “Several editors of scientific publications have highlighted the importance of rigour when conducting and reporting qualitative studies (Salmon 2013, Bell 2014, Cleary et al. 2014).”
Combatting Challenges to Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research (2015, background): “For instance, Mays and Pope (2000) describe the process as “techniques in which the investigator’s account is compared to those of the research subjects, to establish levels of correspondence” (p. 51).”
The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review (2016, methodology): “The quality of most qualitative studies was low because the authors failed to address several key areas, as proposed by Salmon [27].”
How to use and assess qualitative research methods (2020, background): “Depending on the research question and population to be researched this can be limited to professional experience, but it may also include gender, age or ethnicity [17, 27].”
Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, background): “…of application and prominence across scholarly fields over the past 30 years (Elliott et al., 1999; Elmore and Woehlke, 1998; Lombard et al., 2002; Mays and Pope, 2000; Smith, 1987), so much so that some organizations as of late have published standards for reporting and reviewing qualitative…”