Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation.
By James Y. Shah, Arie W. Kruglanski, R. Friedman. 2003
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49255906e702256deeb42313ee1e9da8616beb61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- T. Proulx
- Anirban Mukhopadhyay
- Kathleen D. Vohs
- Carlos J. Torelli
- Jaideep Sengupta
- Steven J. Heine
- S. Ramanathan
- Rohini Ahluwalia
Citations in the corpus
- The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations (2006, background): “The substitutability, or equifinality, of different phenomena suggests that they are in service of the same underlying goal (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Lewin, 1935; Ovsiankina, 1928; Shah et al., 2003; Tesser, 2000).”
- Recalling Past Temptations: An Information-Processing Perspective on the Dynamics of Self-Control (2008, background): “Further, the more the focal goal is bolstered, the more competing goals will be inhibited (Shah et al. 2002).”
- Extending Culturally Symbolic Brands: A Blessing or a Curse? (2012, background): “Goals are mental networks that include desirable end states, associated means, and contexts that, once activated, can guide behavior in goal-congruent directions (Shah, Kruglanski, and Friedman 2003).”