Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: Implication for Prosocial Behavior

By Daniel J. Canary, K. Dindia. 2009

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part two: gender, marital status, income, and wealth (2012, background): “According to Eagly et al, women live up to gender-specific role stereotypes and hence display higher levels of prosocial behaviour, including charitable giving (Eagly and Wood, 1991; Eagly and Koenig, 2006; Eagly, 2009).”
Gender differences in charitable giving (2011, unknown): “…more selfless, empathetic, and generous than men (Andreoni and Vesterland, 2001) (Cox & Deck, 2006) (Croson & Buchan, 1999) (Eagly & Crowley, 1986) (Eagly & Koenig, 2006) (Eckel & Grossman, 1998) (Eisenberg & Lennon, 1983) (Erdle et al., 1992) (Hoffman, 1977) (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2005) (Mills…”
Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: the moderating role of gender (2012, background): “By succumbing to correspondence bias (Gilbert, 1998), whereby corresponding dispositions are inferred from behaviour, we observe women performing communal behaviours and men performing agentic behaviours and infer that women are relatively more warm and nurturing, and that men are relatively more as”
Explaining Gender‐Based Language Use: Effects of Gender Identity Salience on References to Emotion and Tentative Language in Intra‐ and Intergroup Contexts (2008, methodology): “This confound was included to obtain a supportiveness prototype, as emotionality is a part of the feminine characteristic of supportiveness (Eagly & Koenig, 2006).”