The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth
By Jelle Schepers, Wim Voordeckers, Tensie Steijvers, Eddy Laveren. 2014
231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48e08f8f63757d00df0be3d48b1d807300c4427a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Alfredo De Massis
- J. Kotlar
- James J. Chrisman
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- H. Fang
- Esra Memili
- Joshua J. Daspit
- María Concepción López-Fernández
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Alfredo De Massis
- James J. Chrisman
- J. Kotlar
- H. Fang
- Esra Memili
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Joshua J. Daspit
- María Concepción López-Fernández
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Alfredo De Massis
- J. Kotlar
- James J. Chrisman
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- H. Fang
- Esra Memili
- Joshua J. Daspit
- María Concepción López-Fernández
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance (2019, methodology): “The scale we used to measure SEW (Schepers et al., 2014) has been used by others (Goel et al.”
- Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward (2021, methodology): “The themes, ordered by the sequence of principal component extraction, are (1) family ownership and management, (2) literature reviews, (3) internationalization, (4) entrepreneurial behavior, (5) succession, (6) employee relations, (7) SEW, (8) family-based capital, (9) firm size and growth, and (10”
- Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors (2018, background): “Existing research shows that family firms have a higher EO than non-family firms but do not always benefit from it (e.g., Naldi et al., 2007; Schepers et al., 2014).”
- The impact of small- and medium-sized family firms on economic growth (2015, background): “…traditions restricting change, reluctance to risk the family’s reputation, unwillingness to use external financing, and inefficient use of firms resources when there is high emphasis on preservation of socioemotional wealth (e.g., König et al. 2013; Gómez-Mejia et al. 2010; Schepers et al. 2014).”
- The Dark Side of Leadership: Towards a Mid‐Range Theory of Hubris and Greed in Entrepreneurial Contexts (2015, unknown): “(2007), many family firms, including some entrepreneurial family firms, likely pursue socioemotional wealth as a primary goal over the pursuit of financial wealth (Schepers et al., 2014).”
- Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation (2015, background): “Previous studies repeatedly and constantly demonstrate a positive relationship between EO and small-firm performance (Rauch et al. 2009; Schepers et al. 2013; Wiklund 1999; Wiklund and Shepherd 2005; Wiklund et al. 2009), and ‘‘there is reason to believe that EO as an overarching construct can have…”