Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

By Ivan R. Diamond, R. Grant, B. Feldman, P. Pencharz, S. Ling, A. Moore, P. Wales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014

3,009 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48cdce27ceb6efd0968e0e10b4d75e84e08a2f39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. W. J. Sutherland
2. Alan Raybould

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mike Clarke
2. Douglas G. Altman
3. Jane M. Blazeby
4. Elizabeth Gargon
5. Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
6. J. McNeill
7. C. Prinsen
8. Sheila Payne

In Statistics and Probability

1. Mike Clarke
2. Douglas G. Altman
3. C. Prinsen
4. Jane M. Blazeby
5. S. Brookes
6. D. Meier
7. D. Heyland
8. W. J. Sutherland

Citations in the corpus

• ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. (2016, methodology): “The GLs were devised between March 2014 and July 2015, through email exchanges, a two-day live meeting held in Nice, France, in February 2015, followed by three Delphi rounds [19].”
• The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. (2016, neutral): “eral radiomics image processing scheme (24).”
• Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017, methodology): “to attain higher consensus.(29) If an a priori definition of consensus is not realistic due to the Page 16 of 39”
• The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017, background): “Defining consensus As for the scoring system, there are numerous ways proposed to define the consensus criteria, although the choice of criteria is rarely justified [136]; commonly these relate to a mean or median value for each outcome or a percentage of participants scoring an outcome as ‘importan”
• Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?☆ (2015, background): “Another systematic review of a random sample of 100 Delphi papers found that percent agreement was most frequently used [32].”
• The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines (2015, background): “Diamond et al. (2014) report that out of 98 consensus-based Delphi studies, the most common definition for consensus was percentage agreement (usually 75% as the median threshold).”
• Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel. (2017, methodology): “All rounds involving the full panel were anonymous, as is often standard in Delphi panels.(20) For the subgroup and patient/surrogate advisory committee, we used a modified Delphi method created for groups.”