A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Employee Voice Arrangements in Australia

By A. Pyman, B. Cooper, J. Teicher, P. Holland. 2006

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The incidence and effectiveness of different forms of employee voice were compared across three measures: perceived managerial responsiveness to employee needs, job control and influence over job rewards. Multiple regression analyses revealed that voice was perceived as most effective when an amalgam of different forms was present. The effective coexistence of different forms of voice challenges the notion that non-union voice acts as a substitute for union representation.

Subfields: Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48777348f227667bca5c2bb976dba7a1b1c0a611

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Frits K. Pil
2. John Paul MacDuffie

Citations in the corpus

• Employee voice and organizational performance: Team versus representative influence (2010, background): “Employee voice describes how employees raise concerns, express their interests, solve problems, and contribute to and participate in workplace decision-making (Pyman et al., 2006).”