School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States

By C. Hoxby. 2003

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47f319814ecb79cafa25b8c49837ead226b86d43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement (2010, unknown): “(For a general overview of school competition, see Hoxby (2003) and Rouse and Barrow (2009)).”
Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: network governance and the ‘competition state’ (2009, background): “The state ‘needs a strong economy’ (Kelsey 2006, 4) and capital offers the state a means of achieving efficiency gains in education, in terms of quality improvement while at the same time cutting costs (Hoxby 2003), and business does the work of recalibration and organisational change.”
Choosing for quality or inequality: current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden (2010, background): “(Hoxby 2003a, 48) Some of the major theoretical and empirical contributions within the market-skeptical position have been made by Apple (1996, 2003, 2006), Ball (1994, 2003; Gewirtz, Ball, and Bowe 1995; Ball, Reay, and David 2002), Ladd (2002, 2003; Fiske and Ladd 2000, 2003), Reay (2004; Reay…”
International Evidence on School Competition, Autonomy, and Accountability: A Review (2007, background): “…tests is consistent with other evidence from within countries.13 The evidence provided by Neal (1997, 2002) suggests that the choice 13Compare Hoxby (2003a) for a collection of recent research on the economics of school choice. of private Catholic schools leads to higher performance of…”
Causes of educational segregation in Sweden – school choice or residential segregation (2016, background): “This intensifies residential segregation and leads to school segregation (e.g., R. Andersson, 2007; Hoxby, 2003; Lindbom & Almgren, 2007).”
The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: Are children who stay behind left behind? (2008, background): “Sass (2006) explores the performance of charter schools in Florida, while Bifulco and Ladd (2006) addresses charter school performance in North Carolina.”
Independent Schools and Long-Run Educational Outcomes - Evidence from Sweden's Large Scale Voucher Reform (2015, unknown): “12 A Swedish municipality is similar to a school district in the U.S. or LEA in the U.K. in that it is the administrative economic unit as regards to the schools located in the area.”
Choice, Competition and Pupil Achievement (2008, background): “These issues have been widely researched in the US, with an extensive literature in the education and economics of education fields (Hoxby, 2000, 2003, 2004).”
The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan (2009, methodology): “Like Hoxby (2003b) and Betinger (2005), my analysis focuses on Michigan’s charter school program.”
INCENTIVES, CHOICE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES (2003, background): “12 See Ladd (2002) and Hoxby (2003) for a review of the evidence in the context of education. school vouchers which are often rejected on grounds of inequity (see Ladd, 2002).”