Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence

By Leslie Marsh. 2009

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47ced778314ce393e5bd71215d03a6f240b9b3c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Beads for a Plastic Mind: the ‘Blind Man's Stick’ (BMS) Hypothesis and the Active Nature of Material Culture (2008, background): “…Engagement approach the question that makes the difference is neither simply about brain size nor about the changes in cerebral blood flow; the question is about the ‘leaks’, if I may use the term of Andy Clark (1997; 2003), and the possible transubstantiations of this flow into the external world.”
How to Knit Your Own Markov Blanket (2017, background): “Instead, such theorists (see Clark 2003, Clark 2008) stress the multiplicity, flexibility, and transformability of those boundaries, and the way the choice of what boundaries to stress reflects the explanatory interests and projects of the theo-rist.”
From hardware and software to kernels and envelopes: a concept shift for robotics, developmental psychology, and brain sciences (2011, background): “Through incorporation, the body extends temporally including objects, tools, musical interfaces or vehicles as novel envelopes to explore with no fundamental differences with their biological counterpart (Warnier, 1999; Clark, 2004).”
More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education (2018, background): “…about the new biotechnological qualities of interconnected learning – especially in terms of how learning is moving beyond the boundaries of the brain, and what it means to learn when the prospect of accumulating transformed information in our brains is no longer sufficient (Clark, 2003).”
How to situate cognition: Letting nature take its course (2009, background): “Two interlocking key developments (see Clark 2003) likely to support such a transition are, first, the increasing use of portable (perhaps, though not necessarily, implanted) electronics, and second, the spread of ubiquitous and pervasive computing, infusing much of the routinely available material…”
Supersizing the Mind (2008, unknown): “In other words, Clark denies the need of a fine-grained correspondence. What matters in his account is the coarse similarity between Otto and Inga. This coarse similarity is then exploited 1) to show that Otto’s mind extends in his notebook; 2) to demonstrate that there is no logical base to disting”
Human nature and cognitive–developmental niche construction (2010, background): “…more deeply than the extended mind hypothesis, formulated by Clark and Chalmers and developed further by Clark and others (Clark and Chalmers 1998; Clark 1997, 2003, 2008; Menary 2007; Rowlands 2009; Sterelny 2004; Wheeler 2005; Wilson 2004; Wilson and Clark 2009): Maximally opposed to BRAINBOUND…”