Experimental evidence on the evolution of meaning of messages in sender-receiver games
By A. Blume, D. DeJong, Yong Gwan Kim, Geoffrey B. Sprinkle. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Hongbin Cai
- Vincent P. Crawford
- Joseph Tao-yi Wang
- Tore Ellingsen
- Colin F. Camerer
- Roberto A. Weber
- James R. Wright
- Navin Kartik
Citations in the corpus
- Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games (2006, methodology): “, Blume et al., 2001) and argues that the system of subject types should be anchored on the “truster” type of senders and the “believer” type of receivers. In our data, there are indeed senders who always tell the truth (the truster type) and receivers who always believe the senders (the believer ty”
- Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions (2003, background): “Andreas Blume et al. (1998, 2001) find evidence of some such types in experiments with communication games.”
- Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach (2003, background): “It is useful because it allows an organization’s members to coordinate activity tacitly without having to reach agreement explicitly in every instance.”