Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience

By Kankana Mukherjee, Subhash C. Ray, Stephen M. Miller. 2001

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46a250ad1473f5f33469af553b5a93cf03b7a25e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches (2004, background): “Berg et al (1992), for instance, find that productivity gains result from improvements in bank efficiency rather than shifts in the best practice frontier, other evidence indicates that technical change is a more important determinant of productivity growth (Alam, 2001 and Mukherjee et al, 2001).”
Financial deregulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of Indian banks during the post reform period (2006, background): “Subsequently, Mukherjee, Ray, and Miller (2001) in their study of productivity growth in 201 large US commercial banks covering the initial post-deregulation period (1984–1990) uncovered the evidence that productivity grew, on an average, by 4.5% per year, with a significant decline in the initial…”
Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes (2007, background): “…Fried et al. (1999a), Garden and Ralston (1999),Cheng et al. (2000), Resende (2000), Worthington and Dollery (2000), Chakraborty et al. (2001), Mukherjee et al. (2001), Raczka (2001), Ralston et al. (2001), Isik and Hassan (2002), O’Donnell and van der Westhuizen (2002), Otsuki et al.…”
Infeasibility and Directional Distance Functions with Application to the Determinateness of the Luenberger Productivity Indicator (2009, background): “Mukherjee, Ray and Miller [20] report between 1% and 3.5% infeasibilities on a larger sample of 201 US commercial banks over a longer number of years (see their Tables 4–6).”
Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey (2010, unknown): “…However, some studies disaggregate loans into various categories such as housing loans, and other loans (e.g. Sturm and Williams, 2004), real estate loans, commercial loans and personal loans (e.g. Mukherjee et al., 2001; Fare et al., 2004) or short-term and long-term loans (Isik and Hassan, 2002).”
Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector (2005, background): “…of the distribution of profitability increases in the years following deregulation and decreases subsequently (Hao, Hunter, and Yang, 2001; Mukherjee et al., 2001; Tortosa-Ausina, 2002). particularly important as the transitory period of the deregulation process may last longer than…”
Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model (2003, background): “Evidence of IS success has been mixed with some studies showing positive impacts of IS in organizations (e.g., Barua et al. 1991; Barua and Lee 1997; Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1996; Lehr and Lichtenberg 1999; Mukherjee 2001), while others have shown nil or detrimental impacts (e.”
The sources of bank productivity growth in China during 2002-2009: A disaggregation view (2012, background): “Other evidence indicates that productivity growth is mainly driven by technical change for the American (Alam, 2001; Mukherjee et al., 2001), European, and Japanese banks (e.g., Casu et al., 2004; Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2009; Barros et al., 2010; Assaf et al., 2011) by applying the…”
Explaining efficiency differences among large German and Austrian banks (2004, unknown): “As others have found (e.g. Mukherjee et al. 2001, for the US post-deregulation period), efficiency gains might need considerable time to materialize, and this would probably be even more true in stringently regulated labour markets, such as Germany’s and Austria’s, which limit the potential…”
Productivity Growth in the Greek Banking Industry: A Non-Parametric Approach (2006, background): “…period 1989-1994; Gilbert and Wilson (1998) to study the effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks during the period 1991-1994; Mukherjee et al. (2001) to explore productivity growth for a group of large US commercial banks over the initial post-regulation period 1984-1990;…”
Data Envelopment Analysis with Imprecise Data (2011, background): “…and sectors (Sueyoshi and Goto, 2001; Navarro and Camacho, 2001; Murillo-Zamorano and Vega-Cervera, 2001; Mathijs and Swinnen, 2001), banks (Mukherjee et al., 2001; Sathye, 2001; Kuosmanen and Post, 2001; Hartman et al., 2001; Lin et al., 2009; Schaffnit et al., 1997), products and…”