On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production
By P. Starreveld. 2000
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/456c8f56c70db386c90e875a72da322ec16ebd22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Judith F. Kroll
- Albert Costa
- Gretchen L. Sunderman
- A. D. de Groot
- Janet G. van Hell
- E. Navarrete
- W. Heij
- Bart M. M. Rossmark
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Judith F. Kroll
- Albert Costa
- Gretchen L. Sunderman
- E. Navarrete
- A. D. de Groot
- Janet G. van Hell
- W. Heij
- Bart M. M. Rossmark
Citations in the corpus
- Level of categorisation effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm (2003, unknown): “The picture-word interference task is one such paradigm (Meyer, 1996; Miozzo & Caramazza, 1999; Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990; Starreveld, 2000; Starreveld & La Heij, 1995).”
- The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “However, and besides the intrinsic problems when interpreting the time-courses of the effects in this paradigm (see, for example, Starreveld, 2000 and Costa, Colomé, Gómez and Sebastián-Gallés, 2003), a close inspection of the actual results does not seem to be totally consistent with this…”
- Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context* (2013, result): “This latter explanation is in accordance with the standard explanation of the effects of phonological and/or orthographic overlap between a distractor and a picture’s name in picture-naming studies that employ the picture–word task (see e.g., Starreveld, 2000).”
- Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learners and Bilinguals: The Development of Lexical and Conceptual Representations (2008, background): “Moreover, semantic effects tend to be greater early in the planning of an utterance and phonological effects tend to be observed late, although there is some debate about the precise timing of these processes (e.g., Levelt et al., 1991; Schriefers, Meyer, and Levelt, 1990; Starreveld, 2000; Starreve”
- The Production of Noun Phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the Scope of Phonological Encoding in Speech Production☆ (2002, background): “In fluen speech, the phonological properties of the wo are adapted to the contexts in which they app Consider the indefinite determiner “a” in Eng lish.”