Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth

By Elena Huergo, Jordi Jaumandreu. 2004

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4540bafa5ed674866d1be0b3fb2ea64d2cf13ceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms (2010, background): “Evidence by Huergo and Jaumandreu (2004) using the same dataset however shows that firms tend not to report changes which are generalised in the market as innovative productive modifications. can reap higher profits than firms that do not innovate.”
Strength in Numbers: How Does Data-Driven Decisionmaking Affect Firm Performance? (2011, methodology): “Consistent with this argument, it has been reported that younger firms tend to show higher rates of productivity growth due to their higher innovation quality (Huergo and Jaumandreu, 2004).”
Factors Influencing Corporate Dividend Decision: Evidence from Jordanian Panel Data (2008, neutral): “The agency hypothesis of dividends posits that dividend payments can be used as a mechanism to alleviate agency problems (see, for example, Rozeff, 1982, Easterbrook, 1984, and Jensen et al., 1992, among others). The distribution of cash resources reduces the size of internally generated funds avail”
An Investigation of Spanish SME Innovation during Different Economic Conditions (2013, background): “Hughes (2001) found that subjective measures of innovation were superior to objective measures.”
Do process innovations boost SMEs productivity growth? (2013, methodology): “In this line, Verspagen (1999), Gu and Tang (2003), Huergo and Jaumandreu (2004), Parisi et al. (2006), Griffith et al. (2006), Lee and Kang (2007), and Rochina-Barrachina et al. (2008), considering direct measures of innovation output (such as patents, products or process innovations), find that…”
Clarifying the Effect of Intellectual Capital on Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability (2012, positive): “Huergo and Jaumandreu (2004) also controlled for firm’s age because they predicted that IC creation was inherently revolutionary in nature and would thus be influenced by a firm’s age (Rosen, 1991; Zahra, 1999).”
How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? (2004, background): “As far as the practical performance of the measure is concerned, Huergo and Jaumandreu (2002) show the link of these observations to firms’ total factor productivity growth the same year and the subsequent three years.”
Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis (2010, positive): “One example is due to Huergo and Jaumandreu (2004), who estimated that process innovation has a positive impact on productivity that persists for about 3 years, using semiparametric methods and data on Spanish firms.”
The Decision to Import Capital Goods in India : Firms’ Financial Factors Matter (2012, neutral): “Along the same line, Kasahara and Rodrigue (2008); Halpern et al.”
Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? (2013, methodology): “Others have investigated how probability of innovation and productivity growth change across the firm age distribution (Huergo and Jaumandreu, 2004a,b).”