Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited

By M. Jæger. 2006

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72c3cd4f25844f4f91264146b274b764436ec627

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Redistributive Conflicts and Preferences for Tax Schemes in Europe (2010, background): “The common hypothesis states that demand for redistribution will be higher in social democrat regimes than in liberal regimes, while conservative regimes should fall in between the other two (Arts and Gelissen, 2001; Jaeger, 2006).”
Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, methodology): “Despite criticisms of singleitem measures, this survey item has been used in a variety of studies to measure support for redistribution (Jæger, 2006a, 2013; Finseraas, 2008, 2009; Luttmer and Singhal, 2011; Schmidt and Spies, 2014) and I follow this approach.”
Policy feedback and support for the welfare state (2013, background): “Existing research on policy feedback generally measures welfare state support through levels of public support for redistribution (Andreß and Heien, 2001; Jæger, 2006; Svallfors, 1997) or more rarely an index measure of support for particular sectors of the welfare state (Larsen, 2008).”
The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: Causal effects of paternity leave (2011, unknown): “…the current institutions but also their support for the underlying normative principles of the current institutions, numerous journal articles have examined whether cross-national variation in support for the welfare state follows Esping-Andersen’s (1990) regime-typologies (see e.g. Jæger 2006).”
The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach (2013, methodology): “The self-interest explanation, by contrast, argues that the demand for redistribution reflects individuals’ socioeconomic position and their exposure to social risks (for example, Jæger, 2006a; Kangas, 1997; Rehm, 2009).”
High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences (2015, background): “Our argument regarding preference formation is based on a rational choice logic: people will be in favor of state intervention if they expect to gain from it (Meltzer and Richard, 1981; Moene and Wallerstein, 2003; Jaeger, 2006; Häusermann and Schwander, 2011).”