Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis

By Esther Grabe. 2005

804 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/448df7c15e0e90d108136b1a42388fca874a1ad7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Signal Processing

Citations in the corpus

Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies (2007, methodology): “Metrics for comparing the rhythm of different languages—interval measures (Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999) and pairwise variability indices ( Grabe & Low, 2002; Low, Grabe, & Nolan, 2000)—have been relatively successful in distinguishing languages which fall into the conventional rhythmic categories”
Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis Incorporating Generative Adversarial Networks (2017, methodology): “For duration generation, although we can directly apply our algorithm to phoneme duration, it is not guaranteed that naturally-distributed phoneme duration has natural isochrony of the target language (e.g., moras in Japanese) [21].”
The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation (2004, background): “…and French, respectively, are considered models of the two contrasting types, Ôstress-timedÕ and Ôsyllable-timedÕ languages, a longstanding intuitive classification for which investigators are still seeking the relevant acoustic correlates (see Grabe & Low, 2002; Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999).”
Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition (2010, background): “Examples of the latter are Mandarin, Spanish, French, Catalan, Japanese and Italian (Grabe & Low, 2002 ; Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999 ).”
Verb inflections and noun phrase morphology in the spontaneous speech of Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment (2005, background): “According to parental report, all children were learning to speak Spanish as their first language and they had minimal opportunity to learn English.”