Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism.
By Joshua D. Miller, W. Keith Campbell. Journal of Personality, 2008
661 citations recorded by the source corpus.
There is a lack of consensus surrounding the conceptualization of narcissism. The present study compared two measures of narcissism-one used in clinical settings (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, PDQ-4+; Hyler, 1994) and one used in social-personality research (Narcissistic Personality Inventory, NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988)-across two samples. Sample 1 (N=271) was composed of undergraduates, whereas Sample 2 (N=211) was composed of parents of the Sample 1 participants. The scales were significantly interrelated but manifested divergent relations with general personality traits, personality disorders (including expert prototypal ratings of narcissism), recollections of parenting received, and psychological distress and self-esteem. PDQ-4 narcissism captured an emotionally unstable, negative-affect-laden, and introverted variant of narcissism; NPI narcissism captured an emotionally resilient, extraverted form. The clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism primarily share a tendency to use an antagonistic interpersonal style. Implications for the DSM-V are discussed.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/435423d53c68912037d8ef811535c920c4a9ce51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- W. Keith Campbell
- Virgil Zeigler‐Hill
- D. Paulhus
- Daniel N. Jones
- J. Hooley
- S. Rosenthal
- P. Jonason
- Avi Besser
Citations in the corpus
- Collective Narcissism Predicts Hypersensitivity to In–group Insult and Direct and Indirect Retaliatory Intergroup Hostility (2016, methodology): “Grandiose narcissism, defined as excessively positive self-image with delusions of grandeur and selfaggrandizement tendencies (e.g. Miller & Campbell, 2008), was measured using the Polish version of the 16-item Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Ames, Rose, & Anderson, 2006) used in previous…”
- Perfectionism and narcissism: A meta-analytic review (2016, background): “…and narcissistic vulnerability manifest substantially different relations with self-esteem, with narcissistic grandiosity displaying smallto-moderate positive correlations and narcissistic vulnerability displaying moderate negative correlations (Miller & Campbell, 2008; Pincus et al., 2009).”
- Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. (2010, background): “…tend to be ambitious, satisfied, and relatively successful (Campbell 2001, Kohut 1977, Ronningstam 2005a, Russ et al. 2008, Stone 1998, Wink 1992, Wink et al. 2005), although this may be at the cost of having disagreeable interpersonal relations (Miller & Campbell 2008, Miller et al. 2009).”
- The two faces of Narcissus? An empirical comparison of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (2011, methodology): “The appropriate conceptualization and measurement of narcissism generates intense debate (e.g., Brown, Budzek, & Tamborski, 2009; Cain, Pincus, & Ansell, 2008; Miller & Campbell, 2008; Pincus & Lukowitsky, 2010; Rosenthal & Hooley, 2010).”
- The Narcissism Spectrum Model: A Synthetic View of Narcissistic Personality (2018, background): “Specifically, existing evidence consistently finds grandiosity to strongly correlate with extraversion, especially facets of dominance and assertiveness most closely tied to social boldness (Miller & Campbell, 2008; Miller et al., 2012).”
- Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. (2011, background): “Although the DSM-IV NPD criteria emphasize grandiosity over vulnerability (Fossati et al., 2005; Miller, Hoffman, Campbell, & Pilkonis, 2008), it is clear that the DSM-IV text includes substantial descriptions of narcissistic vulnerability , which may be reflected in the questions used to assess NPD”
- Making CEO Narcissism Research Great: A Review and Meta-Analysis of CEO Narcissism (2019, neutral): “Trait theorists believe that an individual’s personality is stable across time and situations, which results in predictable behaviors and motivations (Miller & Campbell, 2008).”
- The influence of pathological narcissism on emotional and motivational responses to negative events: The roles of visibility and concern about humiliation (2010, background): “…psychologists have shown considerable interest in narcissism in recent years but attempts to integrate these bodies of literature have been impeded by differences in the definitions and measurement of narcissism (Cain, Pincus, & Ansell, 2008; Miller & Campbell, 2008; Pincus et al., 2009).”
- Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations (2010, background): “For example, in addition to being extraverted (Miller and Campbell, 2008; Oltmanns et al., 2004), socially exciting (Foster et al.”
- The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors (2016, background): “Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by excessively high self-esteem and relatively low empathy (Miller & Campbell, 2008; Watson, Grisham, Trotter, & Biderman, 1984).”
- Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites (2008, background): “This is distinct from narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 1994).”
- Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: the mediating role of judgment and decision‐making biases (2008, background): “…is Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 113–137 (2008) DOI: 10.1002/bdm closely related to NPD (Miller & Campbell, 2007), this research does not speak directly to clinical NPD, which necessitates diagnostic procedures that cannot be replicated…”