Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis.

By Brittany Gentile, Joshua D. Miller, Brian J. Hoffman, E. Gaughan, Jessica L. Maples, W. Campbell. Journal of Personality, 2011

960 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1acabb5e95782d06e3367205a01b55ba7875e22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Joshua D. Miller
2. G. Kolar
3. W. Keith Campbell
4. M. Back
5. J. Rauthmann
6. Donald R. Lynam
7. Jessica L. McCain
8. Brittany Gentile

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Rauthmann
2. G. Kolar
3. Brittany Gentile
4. Jessica L. McCain
5. Caroline Marker
6. W. Keith Campbell
7. Donald R. Lynam
8. T. Judge

Citations in the corpus

• Upsides to Dark and Downsides to Bright Personality: A Multidomain Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, background): “J. D. Miller et al. (2011) found evidence that the two-factor model of narcissism (i.e., vulnerable, grandiose) led to unique relationships between each narcissism facet and facets of the Big 5 and interpersonal variables.”
• Narcissism Today: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2021, background): “…two decades (cf. Wink, 1991) has revealed that narcissism can also be studied hierarchically (e.g., Cain et al., 2008) and is composed of, at minimum, two distinguishable dimensions— grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism—with vastly different nomological networks (Miller et  al., 2011).”
• The Dark Triad and Interpersonal Perception: Similarities and Differences in the Social Consequences of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy (2012, background): “For example, grandiose versus vulnerable narcissism (Miller et al., 2011) and primary versus secondary psychopathy (Hare, 2003) can be distinguished.”
• Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism from the perspective of the interpersonal circumplex (2012, background): “There appear to be two dimensions of narcissism: grandiose and vulnerable (e.g., Miller et al., 2011; Pincus & Lukowitsky, 2010).”
• Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice (2015, background): “This convergence between narcissism (as measured with the NPI) and extraversion is reflected in a meta-analysis (Miller & Maples, 2011), in which the uncorrected correlation between these two traits was r = .39.”
• Narcissism and Social Media Use: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016, background): “In Big Five terms, grandiose narcissism is composed of high extraversion and openness and low agreeableness (Miller et al., 2011), and extraverts have been shown to have larger social networks in general (Pollet, Roberts, & Dunbar, 2011; Roberts, Wilson, Fedurek, & Dunbar, 2008) and spend more time…”
• Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence (2019, background): “…studies and meta-analytic results related to grandiose narcissism (characterized by a sense of selfimportance, grandiosity, and dominant behavior), much fewer research was devoted to vulnerable narcissism (characterized by interpersonal hypersensitivity and social withdrawal; Miller et al., 2011).”
• How ''dark'' are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy (2012, background): “However, there are also negative sides, such as vulnerability (Miller et al., 2011), less integrity (Blair, Hoffman, & Helland, 2008), and transgressions in long-term relationships (Campbell & Foster, 2002; Campbell, Foster, & Finkel, 2002).”