Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives
By Peter W. Moroz, K. Hindle. 2012
416 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34064ec8b53fd5c62f3e129a78bb16fbc667deb3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Einar Rasmussen
- Andreas Rauch
- Michael H. Morris
- D. Kuratko
- Donald S. Siegel
- Riccardo Fini
- Nadav Shir
- Matthias Fink
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Michael H. Morris
- Einar Rasmussen
- Andreas Rauch
- D. Kuratko
- Johan Wiklund
- Isabella Hatak
- Riccardo Fini
- Nadav Shir
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Johan Wiklund
- Andreas Rauch
- D. Kuratko
- Nadav Shir
- Isabella Hatak
- Riccardo Fini
- Matthias Fink
- Donald S. Siegel
Citations in the corpus
- The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship (2017, methodology): “We further selected and coded the articles through a selection and coding process (Gr egoire et al., 2011; Moroz & Hindle, 2012) with the following questions in mind:”
- The Development of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research Field (2018, background): “Hence, all definitions take a process approach to sustainable entrepreneurship instead of focusing on the individual entrepreneur, according to recent researches; emphasis was laid on the action-oriented entrepreneurship process, and not on the individual entrepreneur ́s traits [33].”
- Entrepreneurship, Self-Organization, and Eudaimonic Well-Being: A Dynamic Approach (2021, background): “The question of whether other phases or stages might merit investigation is also important (e.g., Baron & Markman, 2018; Frese, 2009; Moroz & Hindle, 2012), and consideration of the concepts of self- organization and eudaimonic well- being promises to be of vital importance to such new inquiries.”
- Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts (2018, background): “…fields of research, including science commercialization and academic entrepreneurship, scholars emphasize the processual nature of the phenomena they study, yet variance approaches continue to dominate (McMullen & Dimov, 2013; Moroz & Hindle, 2012; Rasmussen, 2011; Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004).”
- Entrepreneurship and process studies (2015, background): “Even where the term process is used, it is often in attempts to discover the generic and distinct features of what some call the ‘entrepreneurial process’ (Moroz and Hindle, 2012), attempts that run askance to what we here mean by a processual approach.”
- Stress Processes: An Essential Ingredient in the Entrepreneurial Process (2018, background): “For instance, 32 alternative models of the entrepreneurship process w re identified and discussed in a comprehensive review (Moroz & Hindle, 2012).”
- Examining the Future Trajectory of Entrepreneurship (2018, background): “…reflected in entrepreneurship education: Opportunities and the entrepreneurial process, how opportunities are uncovered and exploited through an emergent process and interdependent set of activities (Bygrave 1989; McMullen and Dimov 2013; Moroz and Hindle 2012; Shane 2000; Short et. al.”