Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria.

By T. Picton, S. Bentin, P. Berg, Emanuel Donchin, S. Hillyard, Ray Johnson, Gregory A. Miller, Walter Ritter, D. Ruchkin, Michael D. Rugg and 2 more. Psychophysiology, 2000

2,208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4297e34b99c7a65917a139bec56e6325d6e3585d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data (2006, methodology): “The category-specific average ERPs are then compared with each other using parametric statistical analyses, usually analyses of variance (Picton et al., 2000).”
N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. (2004, methodology): “Latencies were measured at the components’ maximum over each hemisphere and the amplitudes at each of the four electrodes were taken at this latency (Picton et al., 2000).”
Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. (2009, background): “The low-pass setting depends on the other components of interest, as well as the analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion rate (approximately 1=4 A/D rate4; Picton et al., 2000).”
The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception (2009, background): “While these numbers may appear small, it is important to remember that our estimates rely on single-trial EEG data, which in general are deemed to be inherently too noisy to be analyzed (Picton et al., 2000).”
Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging (2004, background): “Additionally, the ERPs of each subject and condition were aligned such that the GFP peak of the P1 component was at 100 ms poststimulus onset (see e.g., Goffaux et al., 2003; Morand et al., 2000; Picton et al., 2000 for similar approaches).”
Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. (2014, neutral): “Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Johnson, R., Jr. (2000).”
Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 (2008, background): “…channel sampling in the study of Thierry et al. (2007a) was not apparent because the authors did not report any test of interactions between electrode and their independent variables (stimulus category and interstimulus variance), contrary to what is customary in ERP research (Picton et al., 2000).”
FUNDAMENTALS OF EEG MEASUREMENT (2002, methodology): “As the consequence of imaging process, certain characteristics of the brainwaves are raised and can be used for user’s command recognition, e.g. motor mu waves (brain waves of alpha range frequency associated with physical movements or intention to move) or certain ERPs.”
Is perception discrete or continuous? (2003, background): “in the calculation of VEPs to exclude all trials that display significant activity in the alpha band [ 54 ], assumed to reflect cortical ‘idling’ [55].”
Choosing MUSE: Validation of a Low-Cost, Portable EEG System for ERP Research (2017, positive): “Amplifier characteristic such as the number of bits available for the converter (8 minimum), the gain of the amplifier, and the common-mode rejection ratio were also stated in the Picton paper (Picton et al., 2000) to have minimum values necessary to achieve sufficient EEG data quality.”
Context Effects on Pitch Perception in Musicians and Nonmusicians: Evidence from Event-Related-Potential Recordings (2001, methodology): “Data normalization was done separately for each subject by dividing the amplitude at each electrode by the square root of the sum of the squared across-subjects averaged amplitudes over the electrodes included in the analysis (McCarthy & Wood, 1985; Picton et al., 2000).”
Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review (2008, methodology): “The methods proposed by McCarthy and Wood [36] are routinely referred to and often applied/recommended [53].”