The Rhetoric and Reality of Public-Private Partnerships

By R. Wettenhall. 2003

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41c68ba6587fe2014cea7d10cb0a0de093708207

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Intellectual Structure Of Research Into PPPs (2011, background): “Finally, Wettenhall (2003), moving from a review of the literature on public sector reform and from a comment to three surveys on PPP practices, shows how widespread references to public–private partnerships are and calls for a serious research attention to develop a classification of PPP…”
Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: the case of Copenhagen Malmö Port (2015, background): “…the company accountable, through representatives on the board, is impaired since the flow of information and transparency is reduced and in the long run this can affect the accountability that the politicians have towards the citizens (Van Ham and Koppenjan, 2002; Watson, 2003; Wettenhall, 2003).”
Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question (2010, neutral): “…partnerships (PPPs) increasingly have become the default solution to government problems and needs, most recently for infrastructure, and they are embraced by a wide range of constituencies, across political parties, and throughout the world (Ghere 2001; Tennyson 2003; Wettenhall 2003).”
Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement (2018, background): “A second line of critique concerns the partnership composition, including sub-optimal partnering configurations (Wettenhall, 2003); not addressing the actual complexity of the problem (Pattberg & Widerberg, 2016); a too dominant private sector (Dauvergne & LeBaron, 2014); too limited ambitions; non-”
Framing and selling global education policy: the promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts (2012, background): “In this sense, the ePPP program resembles more a uni-directional mentoring relationship (from the private to the public) that undermines the mutual learning principle, which is an important policy principle usually highlighted in the literature on partnerships (Linder 1999; Wettenhall 2003; Woods an”
Public Values in Public–Private Partnerships (2014, methodology): “com negative consequences in terms of public values such as transparency and quality (Wettenhall, 2003).”
Planting the Living City (2011, background): “They credit this to opportunities to pool organizational strengths and resources, to increase participation and strengthen civil society, to overcome contractual obstacles, and to expand value-driven rationales to public policy implementation (Besley & Ghatak, 1999 ; Osborne, 2000 ; Stoker, 1997 ”
Security in the age of networks (2004, background): “[2] For a detailed discussion of “the rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships”, see Wettenhall (2003).”