The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude

By A. Eagly, S. Chaiken. 2007

1,092 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41a5017fe44f78fe24355fae3e18d16208a8f917

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, background): “Although prominent scholars have raised related arguments before (e.g., Eagly & Chaiken, 2007; Fazio, 2007), violations of this principle are still very common in the attitude literature.”
The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory (2020, background): “Third, tendency implies that, based on past experiences, respondents reply to an attitude object with ‘some degree of positivity or negativity’ (Eagly and Chaiken, 2007: 585).”
Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? (2015, background): “The above quote from Eagly and Chaiken (2007) suggests this attentiveness to definitions is warranted.”
Examining drivers of sustainable consumption : the influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden (2017, methodology): “However, this does not preclude researchers asking people about their attitudes and thus make them manifest (for a discussion on implicit and explicit attitudes see for example Eagly and Chaiken, 2007).”
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “Attitudes are a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity (such as road pricing schemes), with some degree of favour or disfavour (Eagly and Chaiken, 1993, 2007).”
Focus Group Evidence (2014, background): “The focus group is a contemporary methodological development, in contrast to other qualitative research methods such as the individual interview or participant observation.”
Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework (2012, background): “Studies attempting to provide inclusive, or umbrella, definitions of concepts are quite common in the social sciences and psychology (Castle, 2000; Eagly & Chaiken, 2007; Jones, 147 1999; Waddington, Badge, & Bull, 2005).”
Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model (2007, background): “Many researchers share the assumption that the new indirect measures assess affective responses that have their roots in evaluative associations (Fazio & Olson, 2003). However, there is some controversy as to whether these associations reflect personal or cultural evaluations. Olson and Fazio (2004)”