Moral Disengagement in Harmful but Cherished Food Practices? An Exploration into the Case of Meat

By J. Graça, M. M. Calheiros, Abílio Oliveira. 2014

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/415f22b5d7e7a5a0f654db7d694eebbd6bb0a6ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Röös
2. M. Patel
3. Pete Smith
4. D. Little
5. B. Bajzelj
6. T. Garnett
7. J. Fanzo

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. T. Garnett

Citations in the corpus

• Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures (2017, background): “…people resist the idea of eating less meat and that meat has strong cultural resonance for many people, particularly men (de Boer et al., 2014; Graça et al., 2014, 2015; Ruby and Heine, 2011; Schösler et al., 2015) – points highlighted by the ‘not enough food’ advocates to criticise what they…”