PREDATOR EFFECTS ON AN ASSEMBLAGE OF CONSUMERS THROUGH INDUCED CHANGES IN CONSUMER FORAGING BEHAVIOR

By S. Peacor, E. Werner. 2000

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40ebbf0b27936ff671dafa36140793f29382251e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Rick A. Relyea
2. R. Dukas
3. M. Bertness
4. Jonathan M. Chase
5. S. Peacor
6. D. Bolnick
7. E. Preisser
8. P. Ewanchuk

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. S. Peacor
2. Rick A. Relyea
3. J. Van Buskirk
4. D. Bolnick
5. E. Preisser
6. E. Werner
7. Jonathan M. Chase
8. R. Dukas

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Rick A. Relyea
2. S. Peacor
3. J. Van Buskirk
4. E. Werner
5. D. Bolnick
6. E. Preisser
7. R. Altwegg
8. R. Dukas

Citations in the corpus

• Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour (2002, methodology): “…in an experiment performed in similarly constructed mesocosms but with lower tadpole densities, caged Anax had a similar strong negative effect on small bullfrog activity and microhabitat usage as that seen in the present experiment (Peacor & Werner 2000; data at low green frog tadpole density).”
• TRAIT‐MEDIATED EFFECTS IN ROCKY INTERTIDAL FOOD CHAINS: PREDATOR RISK CUES ALTER PREY FEEDING RATES (2003, background): “…predators also can alter prey traits (nonlethal effects), such as behavior and morphology, resulting in large impacts on competitive interactions (Peacor and Werner 1997, 2000, 2001) and community structure (Turner and Mittlebach 1990, McIntosh and Townsend 1996, Beckerman et al. 1997, Schmitz…”
• A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (2003, background): “This TMII varied from negligible to strongly positive as the density of the small green frog (transmitting species) increased (Peacor and Werner 2000; see also Werner and Anholt 1996, VanBuskirk and Yurewicz 1998).”
• PREDATOR-INDUCED PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN LARVAL NEWTS: TRADE-OFFS, SELECTION, AND VARIATION IN NATURE (2000, background): “Several examples illustrate that interaction strengths are modified by changes in traits of the species that are involved (Wissinger and McGrady 1993, Wootton 1993, Peacor and Werner 1997, 2000).”
• Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees (2003, background): “Such effects of predation include changes in temporal and spatial patterns of activity, food preference, life history, and reduced fitness (Lima and Dill 1990, Peckarsky et al. 1993, Lima 1998, Peacor and Werner 2000).”
• The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis (2002, background): “For example, if predation rates are relatively low, the main effect of the predator may be to induce habitat or behavioural shifts that can either strengthen or weaken one or both competitive effects between a pair of species (Peacor & Werner 2000).”
• PREDATOR-INDUCED LIFE-HISTORY PLASTICITY UNDER TIME CONSTRAINTS IN POOL FROGS (2002, background): “For example, the reaction of prey to the presence of predators can reverse the outcome of competition among anuran larvae (Werner 1991, Werner and Anholt 1996, Peacor and Werner 1997, 2000).”
• THE MANY FACES OF PREDATION: HOW INDUCTION, SELECTION, AND THINNING COMBINE TO ALTER PREY PHENOTYPES (2002, background): “For example, in larval anurans, the addition of predatory cues causes relatively large growth reductions at low competitive densities, but small growth reductions at high competitive densities (Werner and Anholt 1996, Van Buskirk and Yurewicz 1998, Peacor and Werner 2000).”
• RESOURCE COMPETITION MODIFIES THE STRENGTH OF TRAIT- MEDIATED PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS: A META-ANALYSIS (2005, methodology): “This model has been used to explain results for a number of studies in our data set (Peacor and Werner 2000, Resetarits et al. 2004) in which TMI effects on growth go from negative at low competition, to positive at high competition.”
• Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web (2002, background): “Such trait-mediated interactions (Abrams et al. 1996) can have important implications to intra- and interspecific competition (Werner & Anholt 1996; Peacor & Werner 1997, 2000, 2001), but our understanding of their role in community dynamics is still limited despite the elegant work of Schmitz and…”