The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis

By Jonathan M. Chase, P. Abrams, James P. Grover, S. Diehl, P. Chesson, Robert D. Holt, S. Richards, R. Nisbet, T. Case. 2002

735 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a903a243a9c0cd596cdc0c103957e15f0caaa0e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

EFFECTS OF AN HERBICIDE AND AN INSECTICIDE ON POND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES (2005, background): “While these responses might increase periphyton intake, they should increase predation risk as well, a common consequence of competition (Chase et al. 2002).”
Rats dying for mice: Modelling the competitor release effect (2007, background): “This concept is now well adopted by fundamental ecologists (e.g. Kotler & Holt 1989; Holt & Lawton 1994; Chase et al. 2002; Caro & Stoner 2003), but still needs greater attention from applied conservationists.”
Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities (2004, background): “…such as interference competition, facilitation , disturbance, environmental stress, productivity and recruitment, to regulate species distribution and abundance (e.g. Dayton 1971; Menge 1976; Bertness & Callaway 1994; Holt & Lawton 1994; Leibold 1996; Dodds 1997; Chase et al. 2002; Post 2002).”
Evidence for competitive dominance of Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) over other Salmonids in the North Pacific Ocean (2004, background): “Interspecific competition has long been thought to be one of themore important processes determining the structure of natural communities, and many studies have documented competition in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine communities (Schoener, 1983; Bertness et al., 2001; Chase et al., 2002).”
Neighbour‐regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species‐rich tropical forests (2003, background): “The negative relationships between survival and basal area, both heterospecific and conspecific, are circumstantial indicators of density-dependent resource limitation at both sites (Chase et al. 2002).”
Hollow beech trees identified as keystone structures for saproxylic beetles by analyses of functional and phylogenetic diversity (2014, background): “…(2) increased abundance of these feeding guilds in these habitat attributes may support more predators; and (3) large trees may provide more ‘spatial or habitat refuges’, promoting species coexistence among competitors or between predators and preys within shared habitat types (Chase et al., 2002).”
COMPETITION, PREDATION, AND DENSITY-DEPENDENT MORTALITY IN DEMERSAL MARINE FISHES (2005, background): “This is despite the fact that the community-level ramifications of both interactions have been studied intensively, although mostly on land (reviews by Sih et al. 1985, Osenberg and Mittelbach 1996, Gurevitch et al. 2000, Chase et al. 2002).”
Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation (2009, background): “Exploitative (shared resource) and apparent (shared predator) competition can occur concurrently among sympatric prey species (Holt et al., 1994; Chase et al., 2002).”
The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. (2007, background): “Finally, animal consumers may also affect prey biomass indirectly by changing prey diversity (Chase et al. 2002), which in turn can affect prey secondary production (Ives et al. 2005).”