Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems

By Alexander Kaufmann, Franz Tödtling. 2001

582 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40a877ad5ce921b65a3dfb907ab249f383a51dd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Performance: A Human Capital Approach (2006, background): “external actors, seems to be the most successful. Kaufmann and Todtling (2001)”
The Social Finance and Social Innovation Nexus 1 (2012, background): “…and natural scientists interested in change or transformation of complex adaptive systems have recognized the importance of cross scale dynamics (Kaufmann and Tödtling 2001, Gunderson and Holling 2002, Smith et al. 2005, Johnson 2010), few have articulated as clearly as Giddens the complex but…”
Knowledge Networks and Careers: Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links (2007, unknown): “Especially in the sectors where basic science is a key source of innovation and economic advantage, many large firms seek to collaborate with research universities (Kaufmann and Todtling 2001).”
DIFFERENTIATED KNOWLEDGE BASES AND VARIETIES OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS (2007, background): “…dependent on structures and developments which are shaped and take place outside the region (Bathelt, 2003, p. 797).1 Bathelt uses social systems theory to replace the element/relation dichotomy of the innovation systems approach with a system/environment dichotomy (Kaufmann & Tödtling, 2001).”
Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships (2002, background): “In cases where timing matters as, for example, in patent races and waiting games, the theory suggests that will be over-investment in the former and under-investment in the latter and in both 8 See also, Adams, Chiang and Starkey (2001) and Kaufmann and Tödtling (2001).”
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, methodology): “SMEs, thus, have clearly more barriers for interactions with science, demonstrated also by other studies (Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001; Asheim et al., 2003; Fritsch and Schwirten, 1998).”