DIFFERENTIATED KNOWLEDGE BASES AND VARIETIES OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS
By Bjørn T. Asheim. 2007
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87c56a6818208d76024bec73e12341c2bc7ec076
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Markus Grillitsch
- Jesper Manniche
- Arne Isaksen
- Jerker Moodysson
- Roman Martin
- James Karlsen
- Antti Lönnqvist
- Tan Yigitcanlar
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Markus Grillitsch
- Jesper Manniche
- Arne Isaksen
- Jerker Moodysson
- Ida Grundel
- Margareta Dahlström
- Roman Martin
- James Karlsen
In Political Science and International Relations
- Markus Grillitsch
- Jesper Manniche
- Arne Isaksen
- Bjørn T. Asheim
- Ida Grundel
- Margareta Dahlström
- Jerker Moodysson
- Antti Lönnqvist
Citations in the corpus
- Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance : Results from the international comparison of Helsinki (2013, background): “In recent years, this focus has been shifting toward a strong ‘people climate’ to attract and retain the talent in urban regions to form analytical (science-based), synthetic (engineering-based), and symbolic (art-based) knowledge bases (Florida, 2002; Asheim, 2007).”
- Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions (2018, background): “and symbolic (design based) knowledge (Asheim, 2007).”
- Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden (2013, background): “To explain the geography of innovation in different industries theoretically, a distinction is made between three different types of knowledge base: (1) analytical, (2) synthetic and (3) symbolic (Asheim and Coenen, 2005; Asheim, 2007; Gertler, 2008).”
- A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy (2016, background): “Therefore, an RIS can be seen as an institutional infrastructure put in place to support innovations in firms in a specific region (Asheim 2007).”
- A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures (2020, background): “…the marginal involvement of research organizations (in 15% of the initiatives) contrasts with their key role in classical innovation processes (see Asheim, 2007; Miller, McAdam, Moffett, Alexander, & Puthusserry, 2016) and as one actor of the triple helix model: Therefore, the empirical results…”
- Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? (2018, background): “…base approach, distinguishing between analytical/science-based, synthetic/engineering based and symbolic/cultural based types of knowledge (Asheim 2007), argues that economic diversification and innovation-based competition can be achieved in all industries or sectors yet in different…”
- Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway (2010, background): “Research and development is, in general, less important in the DUI mode of innovation (Asheim, 2007).”
- Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics: On the Usefulness of the Differentiated Knowledge Bases Model (2012, methodology): “…on a variety of localized production systems such as regional innovation systems and clusters (Asheim & Coenen, 2005; Vang, 2005; Coenen et al., 2006; Asheim, 2007; Asheim et al., 2007a, 2007b; Moodysson et al., 2008; Asheim & Hansen, 2009; Martin & Moodysson, 2011; Sotarauta et al., 2010).”