Attributes of Angel and Crowdfunded Investments as Determinants of VC Screening Decisions

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance (2018, background): “However, this limitation presents an opportunity for future research to build on our findings by using experimental designs where investor preferences can directly be accounted for and measured (e.g., Davis et al., 2017; Drover et al., 2017b).”
A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research: Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Crowdfunding, and Accelerators (2017, background): “can result in more favorable VC evaluations (Drover et al., 2017).”
Equity crowdfunding in Germany and the United Kingdom: Follow-up funding and firm failure (2018, unknown): “Farre-Mensa et al. (2017) show that startups with patents have an 80 percent higher sales growth five years after they filed the first patent application and higher-quality follow-on innovation.”
Does success bring success? The post-offering lives of equity-crowdfunded firms (2017, methodology): “%) secured private equity from BAs or VCs, while three (1.4”
The evolution and adoption of equity crowdfunding: entrepreneur and investor entry into a new market (2018, background): “Important contributory factors to this success include the depth of the UK entrepreneurial finance ecosystem, the emergence of light-touch regulatory regime and a sympathetic tax system (Estrin et al. 2016; Estrin and Khavul 2016a, b; Drover et al. 2017).”