A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research: Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Crowdfunding, and Accelerators
By Will Drover, Lowell W. Busenitz, Sharon F. Matusik, David M. Townsend, Aaron H. Anglin, Gary Dushnitsky. 2017
573 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3915e0d2fbe7a427e63c4f6551cf7dc851237c70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Oskar Colombo
- Mike Wright
- Jeremy C. Short
- Satish Nambisan
- S. Sarasvathy
- Maryann P. Feldman
- Thomas H. Allison
In Management Information Systems
- Oskar Colombo
- Mike Wright
- Thomas H. Allison
- Jeremy C. Short
- Aaron H. Anglin
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Will Drover
- Regan M. Stevenson
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Mike Wright
- Oskar Colombo
- Dean A. Shepherd
- S. Sarasvathy
- Jeremy C. Short
- Satish Nambisan
- Maryann P. Feldman
Citations in the corpus
- Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study (2020, background): “Passion and entrepreneurial pitches Entrepreneurs must convince investors to provide financial support for their ideas (Chen et al., 2009; Drover et al., 2017; Huang and Pearce, 2015; Kerr et al., 2011; Robb and Robinson, 2014; Shane, 2008).”
- A systematic literature review on accelerators (2019, background): “Recent research calls for further study to examine accelerators as specific organizational forms (Drover et al. 2017; Roundy 2017) with distinct business models (Cohen et al.”
- The evolution of equity crowdfunding: Insights from co-investments of angels and the crowd (2019, background): “Angels are a diverse group (Drover et al., 2017; Wright et al., 2015) that varies on demographical and behavioral dimensions (Sørheim and Botelho, 2016).”
- The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance (2018, background): “However, this limitation presents an opportunity for future research to build on our findings by using experimental designs where investor preferences can directly be accounted for and measured (e.g., Davis et al., 2017; Drover et al., 2017b).”
- Uncertainty, Knowledge Problems, and Entrepreneurial Action (2018, background): “, 2015) across a variety of subfields within entrepreneurship such as social entrepreneurship (Dorado & Ventresca, 2013), entrepreneurial finance (Drover et al., 2017), new venture creation, and processes of organizational emergence (Lichtenstein, Dooley, & Lumpkin, 2006), among many other areas.”
- The Use of Signals in New-Venture Financing: A Review and Research Agenda (2021, methodology): “Compared with low-noise environments, such as one-on-one negotiations between entrepreneurs and venture capital (VC) investors, where the receiver pays attention to each signal (Spence, 1973, 1974), in the high-noise context of crowdfunding, effectively transmitting information is especially challen”
- The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “Clearly, crowdfunding represents an alternate source of venture financing and, as such, is of interest to entrepreneurial finance scholars (e.g., Drover et al., 2017; Harrison, 2017; Wright et al., 2016); however, importantly, the crowdfunding context also has sociological underpinnings as crowd…”