The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century
By Eric K. Kaufman. 2008
527 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f85698effde2c2d0dd975a0dd02225bcff36464
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing (2011, background): “Similarly, students need to understand the individual working styles of their mentors, communicate their needs and expectations to the faculty, develop self-regularity for their own learning with the help of regular feedback, and devote time for the apprenticeship relationship with faculty and the a”
- Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States (2009, background): “…1992; Golde and Dore 2001; Lovitts 2001; Nettles and Millett 2006) and initiatives (e.g., Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2003; National Science Foundation 2004; Walker et al. 2008) that seek to better understand the causes and consequences of doctoral student attrition.”
- Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work (2010, background): “Doctoral supervisors play a critical role in doctoral education, and ‘good’ doctoral supervision is crucial to successful research education programs (Golde 2000; Harman 2002; Seagram, Gould, and Pike 1998; Walker et al. 2008).”