Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis

By Tehmina N. Basit. 2003

1,343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ee0cbc6f1f8f683d5418cd4995493d24b85764c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2009, background): “Differing perspectives, however, attest that “Coding and analysis are not synonymous, though coding is a crucial aspect of analysis” (Basit, 2003, p. 145).”
Pets in danger: exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse (2017, background): “The limitations of attempting to quantify qualitative data have been discussed elsewhere (see Basit, 2003; Loffe & Yardley, 2004; Vaismoradi et al., 2013).”
A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques (2015, methodology): “My third reason for rejecting computer coding software was that Basit (2003) had found that using this approach might be more suited to those who wished to ultimately quantify their data; therefore this approach did not match with my objective of using these pilots as a stepping stone to further…”
Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships (2014, methodology): “To conduct the empirical analysis a hands-on grid analysis (Gordon, 1969; Stephens & Gammack, 1994; Basit, 2003) was developed.”
Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research (2020, methodology): “Although digital analysis software packages such as NVivo scaffold data management, analysis, and write-up (Maher et al., 2018), Basit (2003) argues that the choice will be made contingent on the size of the project, availability of time and funds, and preference and expertise of the researcher.”
Precincts and Prospects in the Use of Focus Groups in Social and Behavioral Science Research (2012, background): “The second level of analysis is interpretative and involves the comprehension of the various themes or perspectives, creates links between the themes, demonstrates how those themes emerged and generates a theory grounded in the data (Basit, 2003).”