Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer‐supplier relationships

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Managing Imbalanced Supply Chain Relationships for Sustainability: A Power Perspective (2014, background): “In order to minimize the risk incurred by scandals in their SCs, these large companies will tend to act unilaterally and put pressure on their suppliers to adopt codes of conduct and more sustainable business practices (Jeremy Hall, 2001; Mollenkopf, Stolze, Tate, & Ueltschy, 2010; E.R. Pedersen & A”
A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains (2012, background): “A commonly observed response to this pressure is 30 that the primary firm introduces codes of conduct to ensure its partners’ business practices to 31 be socially responsible (Pedersen and Andersen 2006).”
Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective (2017, background): “For instance, Pedersen and Andersen (2006) identified bargaining power as an important mechanism safeguarding codes of conduct.”
Management of Social Issues in Supply Chains: A Literature Review Exploring Social Issues, Actions and Performance Outcomes (2017, background): “standards are the most common safeguards against social issues occurring in supply chains and can be a means to achieve social performance which eventually leads to economic performance (Pedersen and Andersen 2006; Jiang 2009).”