Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives (2016, background): “By contrast, creative innovations that are “outside the range of existing practice” (Schumpeter 1947, 150 cited in Peneder 2010) may be less frequent.”
Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms (2013, unknown): “Hence, growth processes are not symmetrical across industries but vary with the innovation intensity of a specific industry sector (Audretsch, 1995; Peneder, 2010) a cornerstone of what is theorized as ‘technological regimes’ (Nelson and Winter, 1982; Spencer and Kirchhoff, 2006).”
The EU 2020 Innovation Indicator: A Step Forward in Measuring Innovation Outputs and Outcomes? (2017, background): “The empirical literature agrees that innovation outputs significantly influence economic performance in all industries, including less knowledge-intensive ones, either through product differentiation or cost reduction (Peneder, 2010; Kirner et al., 2009).”
Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector (2013, background): “Thus, we can alleviate the disadvantage of a lack of useable time series in the CIS data (Peneder, 2010).”