Direct participation and the quality of work

By D. Gallie. 2013

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e78c34d95c1f4714932b1a65f2c89e4d0437ea9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. A. Kalleberg
2. P. Findlay
3. Chris Warhurst

In Public Administration

1. A. Veen
2. T. Barratt
3. Caleb Goods
4. A. Kalleberg
5. P. Findlay
6. Chris Warhurst

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Veen
2. T. Barratt
3. Caleb Goods
4. A. Kalleberg
5. P. Findlay
6. Chris Warhurst
7. Emmanuel Josserand
8. Sarah Kaine

Citations in the corpus

• “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019, background): “consultative participation (Gallie, 2013) and control over work time (McKie et al.”
• The challenge of job quality (2013, methodology): “Using data from a national sample of British employees interviewed in 2006 as part of the UK Skills Survey, the role of task discretion, work organization and participation in decision-making is explored in Duncan Gallie’s article in this Special Issue (Gallie, 2013).”