Does psychic distance moderate the market size–entry sequence relationship?
By P. Ellis. 2008
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d690f2638742bfc0ac3697845b4fa9df28984fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Shavin Malhotra
- Lars Håkanson
- Björn Ambos
- Davide Castellani
- Alfredo Jiménez
- Antonello Zanfei
- Pengcheng Zhu
- K. Sivakumar
In Strategy and Management
- Davide Castellani
- Shavin Malhotra
- Lars Håkanson
- Björn Ambos
- Antonello Zanfei
- Alfredo Jiménez
- K. Sivakumar
- Pengcheng Zhu
Citations in the corpus
- Curvilinear relationship between cultural distance and equity participation: An empirical analysis of cross-border acquisitions (2011, background): “Many researchers have studied the effect of cultural distance on firms' internationalization behaviors, such as international market selection, entry mode choice, international diversification, and firm performance (e.g., Dow, 2000; Ellis, 2008; Mitra and Golder, 2002; Palich and Gomez-Mejia, 1999; ”
- Effect sizes and the interpretation of research results in international business (2010, background): “However, on only a few occasions were these results were explicitly identified as estimates of the underlying effect size (e.g., Ellis, 2008; Luk et al., 2008).”
- Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? (2011, unknown): “International business scholars have studied several types of distance and their effects, including psychic distance (e.g., Ellis, 2008; Evans & Mavondo, 2002; Johanson & Vahlne, 1977; O’Grady & Lane, 1996), cultural distance (e.g., Brouthers & Brouthers, 2001; Dikova, Rao Sahib, & Van…”
- Paths to foreign markets: Does distance to market affect firm internationalisation? (2007, background): “Others attribute the mixed results to unmeasured effects of external initiators and the implicit assumption that gaps between buyers and sellers are equidistant (Ellis, 2000, 2006).”
- The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “Of these 32 studies, 30 studies used a post hoc measure of distance, whereas two used perceptions of an independent panel (Ellis 2008; Håkanson and Ambos 2010).”
- The Antecedents of Psychic Distance (2010, background): “…based on respondents’ judgments as to the degree of similarity between home and target countries produce asymmetry whenever more than one source country is involved (Brock, Shenkar, Shoham, and Siscovick, 2008; Dichtl et al. , 1984, Ellis, 2008; Dow, 1990; Stöttinger and Schlegelmilch, 1998).”
- Distance factors and target market selection: the moderating effect of market potential (2009, background): “This divergence in the impact of distance factors on international market selection behavior of firms is intriguing as theoretically it implies that the observed variability in these empirical studies may be examined by moderating factors ( Ellis, 2008”
- How remote are R&D labs? Distance factors and international innovative activities (2013, methodology): “Cognitive maps have been used for this purpose (Ellis, 2008; Evans & Mavondo, 2002; Sousa & Bradley, 2006).”