Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations

By Charles Henderson, M. Dancy. 2006

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Physics Education Research (PER) practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation, interviews were conducted with five likely users of physics education research. All reported making changes in their instructional practices and all were influenced, to some extent, by educational research. Yet, none made full use of educational research and most had complaints about their interactions with educational researchers. In this paper we examine how these instructors used educational research in making instructional decisions and identify divergent expectations about how researchers and faculty can work together to improve student learning. Although different instructors emphasized different aspects of this discrepancy between expectations, we believe that they are all related to a single underlyin...

Subfields: Education, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d472c9ab92e790cac2e2684d8fdeb0b7de4b31d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Natalie R. Nielsen
  2. Jennifer Docktor
  3. Jose P. Mestre

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

  1. Natalie R. Nielsen
  2. Jose P. Mestre
  3. Jennifer Docktor

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Natalie R. Nielsen
  2. Jose P. Mestre
  3. Jennifer Docktor

Citations in the corpus