UNSTRUCTURED SOCIALIZING AND RATES OF DELINQUENCY

By D. Osgood, Amy L. Anderson. 2004

531 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d00abe0762f3a64ce34181c1ebf49a9a7946166

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Transformations in adolescent peer networks (2011, background): “Thus, similarity may be a result of the opportunity to meet similar others, also called propinquity (see also Osgood & Anderson, 2004).”
Gang Membership, Gun Carrying, and Employment: Applying Routine Activities Theory to Explain Violent Victimization Among Inner City, Minority Youth Living in Extreme Poverty* (2008, background): “As a result, routine activities theory may be a useful tool to bridge the gap between explanations of offending and victimization by specifying individual-level routine activities that account for both victimization and offending (Osgood & Anderson, 2004).”
Predictors of Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior in an Adolescent Sports Context (2011, background): “This is of importance because “contextual effects are consequences of emergent properties of groups or social settings, and thus they cannot be accounted for at the individual-level” (Osgood & Anderson, 2004, p. 522).”
Exposure to Situations Conducive to Delinquent Behavior (2009, background): “To maintain consistency with Osgood et al.’s (1996) conceptualization of guardianship as situational in nature, our two measures of parental guardianship, single-parent family and parental availability, reflected physical presence and implied “role responsibilities” rather than the extent of individ”
Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? (2012, unknown): “, 1985; Matsueda and Anderson, 1998; Patterson and Dishion, 1985) or other peer factors, such as time spent with peers (Osgood and Anderson, 2005; Svensson and Oberwittler, 2010).”
When Is Spending Time With Peers Related to Delinquency? The Importance of Where, What, and With Whom (2015, background): “One study found no significant interaction effect between delinquent peers and unstructured socializing with peers (Osgood & Anderson, 2005).”
Gender, Adolescent Lifestyles, and Violent Victimization: Implications for Routine Activity Theory (2010, background): “adolescents have supported this notion, finding that unstructured, peer-oriented leisure activities are related to delinquency ( Agnew & Petersen, 1989 ; Osgood & Anderson, 2004 ; Osgood et al, 1996 ).”
A new method for studying the extent, stability, and predictors of individual specialization in violence (2007, background): “Unstructured socializing with peers is the mean of the four items that Osgood et al. (1996) identified in their application of the routine activities perspective to individual offending.”
Gangs and Violence: Disentangling the Impact of Gang Membership on the Level and Nature of Offending (2013, background): “That is, it could be that gangs attract people with a propensity for criminal involvement, including violence, and the group setting increases the opportunities for engaging in such behavior (Gottfredson and Hirschi, 1990; Osgood and Anderson, 2004).”