The Detection of Auditory Visual Desynchrony

By N. Dixon, Lydia Spitz. 1980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…to rely on them for the perception of the multisensory coherence of a broad variety of multisensory events including light flashes and beeping sounds, moving and impacting objects, and audiovisual speech (Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Hillock-Dunn & Wallace, 2012; Lewkowicz, 2010; Lewkowicz & Flom, 2013).”
Multisensory temporal integration: Task and stimulus dependencies (2013, unknown): “Not surprisingly, the TBW has been measured using a variety of different tasks, stimulus types, and statistical criteria (Dixon and Spitz 1980; Miller and D’Esposito 2005; Zampini et al. 2005; Conrey and Pisoni 2006; Vatakis and Spence 2006; van Atteveldt et al. 2007; van Wassenhove et al. 2007; Ste”
Infants' perception of the audible, visible, and bimodal attributes of multimodal syllables. (2000, unknown): “( Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Massaro, 1998; McGrath & Summerfield, 1985; Radeau, 1994) and infants (Bahrick, 1992; Lewkowicz, 1992a, 1996b; Spelke, Born, & Chu, 1983; Walker, 1982) has shown that temporal AV relations contribute in important ways to intersensory integration.”
The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech (2009, background): “The last observation from our measured statistics is that the time-to-voice (the delay between onset of mouth movements and the onset of the voice) is between 100 and 300 milliseconds. This was true for words with bilabial consonants at the beginning, as well for VCV sounds where the consonant (and ”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “Likewise, adults can perceive a desynchronization of the audible and visible streams of an audiovisual speech utterance when the former precedes the latter by anywhere between 41 (Grant, van Wassenhove, & Poeppel, 2004) and 130 ms ( Dixon & Spitz, 1980 ).”
Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study (2004, background): “…signal preceded the visual signal by 240 ms, a temporal asynchrony between the two sensory streams to which human listeners should be sensitive (Dixon and Spitz, 1980), and which falls outside the usual temporal window for McGurk-like audiovisual integration in speech perception (Van…”
When knowing can replace seeing in audiovisual integration of actions. (2009, unknown): “Additionally, it is interesting to notice that the perceived best alignment between the visual and auditory stimuli (PSS) occurred when the audio was delayed with respect to the video (Dixon & Spitz, 1980; McGrath & Summerfield, 1985; Arrighi et al., 2006) in all the display conditions but one.”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “Adult research has reported differences in asynchrony detection for speech and non-speech stimuli (Dixon & Spitz, 1980), and there has been speculation regarding the role of content-oriented processing of multisensory speech on the temporal window (Ryan A. Stevenson et al., 2014).”
Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. (2007, background): “…bimodal speech (congruent or incongruent) ppears to tolerate much larger asynchronies than has been eported for non-speech stimuli (e.g. Dixon & Spitz, 1980) and rgues for temporal integration far beyond the classical notion f simultaneity and temporal order threshold established with…”
Perceptual training narrows the temporal window of multisensory binding (2009, background): “It should also be noted that the mean window sizes and shapes observed at baseline assessment ( 275–300 ms, skewed toward the positive side of the distribution) are very much in accord with those reported in previous work (Dixon and Spitz, 1980; Bushara et al., 2001; Zampini et al., 2003, 2005a,b; C”
A Psychophysical Investigation of Differences between Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments (2013, result): “, [15,16,32,35]); hence, it was of interest to test if any differences found between TOJs and SJs were consistent across these stimulus types [2].”
The Construct of the Multisensory Temporal Binding Window and its Dysregulation in Developmental Disabilities (2014, background): “…2004, 2010, 2011; Colonius, Diederich, & Steenken, 2009; Conrey & Pisoni, 2006; Diederich & Colonius, 2004, 2007, 2009; Diederich et al., 2003; Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Frens, Van Opstal, & Van der Willigen, 1995; Hay-McCutcheon, Pisoni, & Kirk, 2005; Hay-McCutcheon, Pisoni, & Hunt, 2009;…”
The Audio-Visual Temporal Binding Window Narrows In Early Childhood (2013, unknown): “In adults, the corresponding values are around 80 and 112–187 ms, respectively (Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Lewkowicz, 1996).”