Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study

By Emiliano Macaluso, Nathalie George, R. J. Dolan, Charles Spence, Jon Driver. 2004

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

A Neurorobotic Experiment for Crossmodal Conflict Resolution in Complex Environments * (2018, background): “, spatial and temporal coincidence) and highlevel properties such as spatiotemporal congruency, prior knowledge, and expectations [6].”
The Construct of the Multisensory Temporal Binding Window and its Dysregulation in Developmental Disabilities (2014, background): “Moreover, the pSTS is differentially active during the presentation of synchronous versus asynchronous audiovisual stimulus pairs, suggesting an important role in evaluations of audiovisual timing (Macaluso et al., 2004; Miller & D’Esposito, 2005; Powers et al., 2012; Stevenson et al., 2010, 2011).”
Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration (2007, unknown): “and through headphones) (Calvert et al. 2000; Laurienti et al. 2004; Macaluso et al. 2004).”
Multisensory integration of speech signals: the relationship between space and time (2006, unknown): “In a recent PET study, Macaluso et al. (2004) presented a”
Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer (2011, background): “(Note that laboratory-based research has recently uncovered the neural substrates of the audiovisual spatial ventriloquism effect; see Bonath et al., 2007; Macaluso et al., 2004.)”
The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain. (2011, unknown): “…that posterior parietal regions including IPS, the IPL (BA 40), and the SPL (BA 39) responded preferentially to cross-modal compared with unimodal presentations (Baumann and Greenlee 2007; Bishop and Miller 2008; Calvert et al. 2001; Grefkes et al. 2002; Macaluso et al. 2004; Moran et al. 2008).”
Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance (2012, unknown): “…single-unit recordings (Meredith et al. 1987, 1992; Royal et al. 2009), ERPs (Schall et al. 2009; Senkowski et al. 2007; Talsma et al. 2009), fMRI (Macaluso et al. 2004; Miller and D’Esposito 2005; Stevenson et al. 2010, 2011), and behavioral studies (Conrey and Pisoni 2004, 2006; Dixon and Spitz…”
Neural Correlates of Multisensory Perceptual Learning (2012, background): “Several studies have established that visual and auditory events originating from the same location in space are highly likely to be perceptually bound (Slutsky and Recanzone, 2001; Macaluso et al., 2004; Teder-Sälejärvi et al., 2005; Innes-Brown and Crewther, 2009).”
Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, background): “unfused multisensory percepts have failed to observe any activation in this posterior region of the STS (Olson et al., 2002; Bushara et al., 2003; Jones & Callan, 2003; Macaluso et al., 2004; Miller & D’Esposito, 2005; Ojanen et al., 2005 see also Hein & Knight, 2008).”
Multisensory temporal integration: Task and stimulus dependencies (2013, unknown): “…the STS to be differentially responsive based on the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli across a wide range of tasks and stimulus types (Macaluso et al. 2004; Miller and D’Esposito 2005; Stevenson and James 2009; Stevenson et al. 2010, 2011), necessary for audiovisual perceptual fusion…”
Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes (2016, background): “[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.] r 280 r [reviewed in Murray and Wallace, 2012], including those focusing on stimulus (a)synchrony [e.g., Macaluso et al., 2004].”