The Relationships of Destination Image, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions: An Integrated Model

By Chun-yang Wang, Maxwell K. Hsu. 2010

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c7eafe5c213526108d9b7207376cf9b2291a971

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Influence of Destination Image on Tourist Loyalty and Intention to Visit: Testing a Multiple Mediation Approach (2019, background): “As brought into evidence by numerous studies, destination image has been a core aspect of tourism study from the last decade, even though theoretical elements were offered by other approaches over time [26].”
Tourists’ Destination Loyalty through Emotional Solidarity with Residents: An Integrative Moderated Mediation Model (2018, background): “As such, satisfaction has been measured as a multiitem scale (Chi and Qu 2008; del Bosque and San Martin 2008; Gallarza and Saura 2006; Wang and Hsu 2010).”
Natural soundscapes and tourist loyalty to nature-based tourism destinations: the mediating effect of tourist satisfaction (2018, background): “The opinion that tourist satisfaction is a good mediating variable is supported by many previous tourism studies (Baloglu et al., 2003; Lee, 2009; Prayag, 2009; Wang & Hsu, 2010).”
Destination Image and Behavior Intention of Travelers to Thailand: the Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk (2013, methodology): “Wang and Hsu (2010) examined destination image dimensions and classified them into five categories: tourism resources (i.e., rich heritage, full of cultural activities), amenities (i.e., shopping facilities and high quality of lodging), supporting factors (i.e., convenience of transportation and…”
An exploration of the effects of past experience and tourist involvement on destination loyalty formation (2013, background): “Although the study of consumer loyalty is a much more recent phenomenon in tourism (Oppermann, 2000 ), it has been shown that satisfied tourists are more likely to return to a destination in the future and to share their experiences with other people (Bigne et al, 2001 ; Chen & Myagmarsuren, 2010”
Explaining conative destination image through cognitive and affective destination image and emotional solidarity with residents (2020, unknown): “Such distinction is a conceptual and methodological tool that facilitates examination of the complex concept of image (Chew & Jahari, 2014; Stylos, Bellou, Andronikidis, & Vassiliadis, 2017; Wang & Hsu, 2010).”
Destination Image Analytics through Traveller-Generated Content (2019, background): “Last, overall image (cognitive and affective images) indirectly influences tourists’ behavioural intentions mediated by their satisfaction [79], which is positively affected by overall image, as are their intentions to recommend the destination [80].”
Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: The case of Sina Weibo (2017, methodology): “In other words, destination image influences tourists’ satisfaction and behavioral factors such as the choice of travel destination, the subsequent evaluations of the destination, and their behavioral intentions in the future (Wang & Hsu, 2010).”
Destination loyalty explained through place attachment, destination familiarity and destination image (2020, methodology): “Such results are in keeping with extant work revealing the positive link between the constructs (Li et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2007; Wang & Hsu, 2010).”
Destination image and tourist behavioural intentions: A meta-analysis (2020, unknown): “Some studies measure destination image as a unidimensional construct (Bui & Le, 2016; Sharma & Nayak, 2019), and others refer to it as a multidimensional construct which is measured by cognitive, affective, and conative dimensions (Wang & Hsu, 2010; Assaker & Hallak, 2013; Mun, Lee & Jeong, 2018).”