Instrumental Relations Among Groups: Group Competition, Conflict, and Prejudice

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Differentially Moderate Intergroup Effects on Prejudice (2010, background): “…583–601 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/per number of theoretical perspectives that view intergroup relations of this kind as highly conducive to prejudice (e.g. Esses et al., 2005; Greenberg et al., 1997; Jost & Banaji, 1994; Schaller, Park, & Faulkner, 2003; Sherif, 1967; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Stephan &…”
Intergroup Contact and Ingroup Reappraisal: Examining the Deprovincialization Thesis (2010, background): “In their Unified Instrumental Model of Group Conflict, Esses and colleagues (Esses et al. 2005) argue for the importance of ideological factors that can heighten sensitivity to ingroups and outgroups.”
Why do citizens want to keep refugees out? Threats, fairness and hostile norms in the treatment of asylum seekers (2007, background): “…and norms have been observed to shape individual-level variables such as social dominance orientation (Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen, 2003), rational choice calculations (Louis, Taylor, & Douglas, 2005; Louis, Taylor, & Neil, 2004), and instrumental concerns (Esses et al., 1998, 2001, 2005).”