INTERVENTIONS: Controversies and Evidence
By D. Chambless, T. Ollendick. 2001
1,764 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bab1c2728ad2ebaf664000637fc119cee67fb53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Fixsen
- Susan Michie
- P. Wachtel
- R. Beidas
- Elisa S. Shernoff
- Thomas Kratochwill
- Karen A. Blase
- J. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Effects In Psychotherapy: Counterfactuals Counteract Overgeneralization (2010, background): “Behavioral analysts have worked extensively on study designs for inference in treatment effects based on repeatedly observation of single subjects (eg, Barlow & Hersen, 1984 ; Chambless & Ollendick, 2001 ; Kazdin, 2003 ).”
- BEYOND "ESTs" Problematic Assumptions in the Pursuit of Evidence-Based Practice (2010, background): “Chambless and Ollendick (2001), for example, in an influential statement of the “EST” approach, depict as the requirement “treatment manuals or their equivalent in the form of a clear description of the treatment.”
- Cognitive Restructuring: An Islamic Perspective (2008, background): “…of psychotherapy for a variety of psychological conditions, including anxiety and stress, depression, eating disorders, panic disorder, and phobias (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001); it is also one of the most evidence-based and empirically supported (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Leahy & Holland,…”
- Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the (2005, background): “…programs has been furthered by on-going eff orts to research and refi ne programs and practices, to defi ne “evidence bases” (e.g., Burns, 2000; Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Lonigan, Elbert, & Johnson, 1998; Odom, et al., 2003), and to designate and catalogue “evidence-based programs or…”
- Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications. (2005, background): “Currently, much of the evidence remains at the level of a dpromising interventionT (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001), rather than for example being validated by randomized control trials.”
- Allegiance in Psychotherapy Outcome Research: Separating Association From Bias (2009, background): “…that a researcher who believes that behavioral activation will outperform applied relaxation for depression may be revealing his or her familiarity with empirical data (see Chambless & Ollendick, 2001), rather than an unjustified allegiance that has influenced the data in his or her outcome study.”
- Evidence‐Based Psychosocial Treatments for Tic Disorders (2007, background): “This notion is supported by Chambless and Ollendick (2001) as they argue that “clinicians need summaries of evidence provided by expert reviews” to guide practice (p. 686).”
- Social skills training augments the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder (2005, background): “CBGT is the most extensively researched psychotherapy for SAD to date, and is included on a list of empirically supported treatments (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001).”
- A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008, background): “…a task force established by Division 13 of the American Psychological Association sought to identify psychological treatments that had been found to be effective for particular conditions with a view to developing treatment manuals with which to train practitioners (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001).”
- An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. (2009, background): “These five instances are not unrelated and are an increasing part of the scientific practice of clinical and school psychology (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Kratochwill & Stoiber, 2002).”